HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-023-1205 - Fair Housing Choice (AI)
City of Miami Gardens Agenda Cover Memo Council Meeting Date: January 27, 2010 Item Type: (Enter X in box) Resolution Ordinance Other X Fiscal Impact: (Enter X in box) Yes No Ordinance
Reading: (Enter X in box) 1st Reading 2nd Reading X Public Hearing: (Enter X in box) Yes No Yes No X Funding Source: Advertising Requirement: (Enter X in box) Yes No X Contract/P.O.
Required: (Enter X in box) Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid #: N/A X Sponsor Name Danny Crew, City Manager Department: Community Development Short Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING ITS COMMITMENT TO AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHER FAIR HOUSING AND CERTIFYING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) AS DEVELOPED BY HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT FOR EXCELLENCE, INC. (HOPE, INC.); PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF REPRESENTATIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Staff Summary: Background The Fair Housing Act of
1968 requires all recipients of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to conduct an assessment of the barriers to housing choice and to develop a plan for overcoming the impediments
identified. The Consolidated Plan regulations (24 CFR 91) require a certification by each jurisdiction to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). To satisfy this requirement several
actions are needed including: 1) the completion of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI); 2) implementation of action plans to eliminate any identified impediments;
and, 3) maintenance of AFFH records, corresponding with implementation of the Consolidated Plan every five years. ITEM J-9) CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice
1515 NW 167 Street, Building 5 Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169 The City contracted with Housing Opportunities Project for Excellence, Inc. (HOPE, Inc.), a private fair housing,
non‐profit corporation dedicated to eliminating housing discrimination and promoting fair housing to develop the City’s AI. HOPE, Inc. employs a two‐tiered system of Fair Housing (Education
& Outreach and Private Enforcement) and Special Housing programs to achieve its mission to affirmatively further fair housing. HOPE, Inc. is the only private, full‐service fair housing
organization in Miami‐Dade and Broward counties. They have completed AI’s for over 15 local jurisdictions. The report identified five impediments to fair housing choice in the City of
Miami Gardens including: 1. Violations of federal, state, and local fair housing laws in the jurisdiction and immediate surrounding areas 2. Lack of awareness of fair housing laws, issues
and resources 3. Racial disparities in fair and equal lending 4. A strongly segregated housing market 5. Limited funding availability for the creation of affordable housing opportunities
The report also included a suggested fair housing plan with five goals as indicated below: 1. Reduce incidences of housing discrimination 2. Educate the community about its rights and
responsibilities to fair housing 3. Reduce discriminatory and abusive practices in lending 4. Promote integration and diversity with the City 5. Provide more affordable housing Current
Situation Since the completion of the Analysis of Impediments the Department has been working with HOPE, Inc. to identify the best approach for the implementation of fair housing activities
in the City. While the violations of fair housing laws were not being carried out by the City, some of the impediments identified could potentially be occurring within the private sector
in the City’s boundaries. The City’s existing housing programs include rehabilitation, homeowner assistance, neighborhood stabilization, and homelessness prevention and rapid re‐housing
(HPRP). Of these programs, only participants in the homeowner assistance, and HPRP could potentially be affected by fair housing choice as indicated in the AI. As a result, the Department
recommends certification of the AI developed by HOPE, Inc. and the implementation of a Fair Housing Education Campaign to confirm the City’s commitment to affirmatively further fair
housing. City of Miami Gardens Fair Housing Education Campaign will included the following: • Make fair housing information and housing discrimination brochures available for City residents
• Provide fair housing information to all housing program participants • Coordinate with HOPE, Inc., Miami‐Dade County or other appropriate organization to offer a citywide fair housing
training workshop to the general public • Include the City’s commitment to affirmatively further fair housing choice in the City’s Housing Policy and Procedures Manual
1515 NW 167 Street, Building 5 Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169 • Update the City’s website to include its commitment to affirmatively further fair housing choice along with information
regarding fair housing and a link to HUD’s fair housing web page. Proposed Action: Staff recommends that the Council pass the proposed resolution certifying the Analysis of Impediments
to Fair Housing Choice and accepting the actions outlined in the resolution. Attachment: Attachment A ‐‐Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
City of Miami Gardens Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Submitted by: Housing Opportunities Project for Excellence, Inc. (HOPE, Inc.) September 2008
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. History and Purpose 3 B. Who Conducted the Analysis 4 C. Methodology 4 D. Funding 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 III. JURISDICTIONAL DEMOGRAPHIC/BACKGROUND
DATA A. Population 7 B. Income 9 C. Employment 10 D. Housing 12 E. Government Structure 15 IV. JURISDICTION’S FAIR HOUSING PROFILE A Fair Housing Complaints 16 B. Fair Housing Discrimination
Suits Filed 19 C. Reasons for Trends or Patterns 20 V. JURISDICTION’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE A. Fair Housing Enforcement 24 B. Informational Programs 28 C. Lending Policies and Practices
29 D. Employment, Housing, Neighborhood Revitalization, Transportation--Needs and Obstacles 33 E. Public and Assisted Housing 34 F. Homelessness 37 G. Planning and Zoning/Building Codes
(Accessibility) 41 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Identified Impediments 42 B. Fair Housing Plan 43 VII. SIGNATURE PAGE CDBG Administrator -Chief Elected Official APPENDIX Attachment
1 -Map, City of Miami Gardens Attachment 2 -Map, Racial Demographic by Census Block Group Attachment 3 -City of Miami Gardens Organizational Chart Attachment 4 -Lending Table 1, Charts
1a-c (Race) Attachment 5 -Lending Table 2, Charts 2a-f (Gender) Attachment 6 -Lending Table 3 (Income) Attachment 7 -Lending Table 4 (Income Tract) Attachment 8 -Lending Table 5 (Minority
Tract)
3 I. INTRODUCTION A. History and Purpose The Federal Fair Housing Act, Section 808(e)(5), requires the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (the Department)
to administer the Department’s housing and urban development programs in a manner as to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). All localities that are direct recipients of Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the Department are required to conduct an assessment of the barriers to housing choice and to develop a plan for overcoming the impediments
identified. Although the grantee’s AFFH obligation arises in connection with the receipt of Federal funding, its AFFH obligation is not restricted to the design and operation of HUD-funded
programs at the State or local level. The AFFH obligation extends to all housing and housing-related activities in the grantee’s jurisdictional area whether publicly or privately funded.1
In September 2004, the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) reissued a memorandum guidance originally issued on February 14, 2000, regarding the requirement that local
jurisdictions receiving funding through the Consolidated Plan process should update, where appropriate, its Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The purpose of the memorandum
was to remind the jurisdictions, especially at the beginning of a new Consolidated Plan five-year planning cycle, that it is appropriate to update their AI’s to reflect the current fair
housing situation in their communities. Subsequent AI’s are to be completed or updated in accordance with future timeframes for the Consolidated Plan. A summary of the previously conducted
AI plus the jurisdiction’s accomplishments for the past program year are requisite components of the performance report required by the Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan regulations
(24CFR 91) require a certification by each jurisdiction that it will affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH), which requires Fair Housing Planning. Fair Housing Planning entails: 1)
the completion of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice; 2) implementation of action plans to eliminate any identified impediments; and, 3) maintenance of AFFH records, corresponding
with implementation of the Consolidated Plan every three to five years. For fair housing that means that the jurisdiction will continue to certify that they will affirmatively further
fair housing as a condition of continuing to receive federal funds. Local jurisdictions can meet this obligation by conducting an AI, developing an Action Plan and implementing strategies
designed to overcome these barriers based on their history, circumstances, and experiences. In other words, the local jurisdictions should define the problems, develop the solutions
and be held accountable for meeting the standards they set for themselves. An analysis of the impediments to fair housing is more than a catalog of illegal acts. It is a study of the
barriers to housing choice. This study must identify those systemic or structural issues that limit the ability of people to take advantage of the full range of 1 U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Fair Housing Planning Guide, Chapter 1, Section 1.2, 1-1
4 housing which should be available to them. The City of Miami Gardens has done much to expand the housing choices of its residents through a variety of programs. An attempt has been
made herein to identify the immediate barriers, without discussing the causes/reasons for income disparities which are beyond the scope of this study. B. Who Conducted the Analysis Housing
Opportunities Project for Excellence, Inc. (HOPE, Inc.) is a private fair housing, non-profit corporation established in 1988, dedicated to eliminating housing discrimination and promoting
fair housing. HOPE, Inc. employs a two-tiered system of Fair Housing (Education & Outreach and Private Enforcement) and Special Housing programs (Group/Individual Mobility Counseling
and Relocation Services) to achieve its mission to affirmatively further fair housing. The programs are designed to ensure that people are offered the right to select housing of their
choice without discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, religion, familial status, disability and such other protected classes as may be conferred by federal, state
or local laws. HOPE, Inc. has completed Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice as consultants to over 15 local jurisdictions and has been instrumental in the recovery of nearly
$9 million in out-of-court settlements for victims of housing discrimination. HOPE, Inc. is the only private, full-service fair housing organization in Miami-Dade and Broward counties
engaged in testing for fair housing law violations and pursuing the enforcement of meritorious claims. C. Methodology This Analysis of the Impediments to Fair Housing Choice is prepared
on behalf of the City of Miami Gardens, Florida. The U.S. HUD Fair Housing Planning Guide was utilized in the preparation of the Analysis. The process of identifying impediments and
recommending corrective actions included, but was not limited to, the review and extraction of data from the following: the Consolidated Plan, the Comprehensive Development Master Plan;
the official City of Miami Gardens website and U.S. Census Bureau data. City of Miami Gardens staff from the Community Development and Planning and Zoning Departments provided written
responses to a HUD Fair Housing Planning Guide survey and were instrumental in the provision of pertinent information for completion of the AI. A survey of City of Miami Gardens residents
was completed to determine their knowledge and perceptions of fair housing issues affecting the jurisdiction. Impediments to fair housing in the homebuyer market were examined by analyzing
relevant NCRC Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data and the Florida Home Minority Lending Report, with special acknowledgments to the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC).
D. Funding The City of Miami Gardens executed a funding agreement with HOPE, Inc. effective October 1, 2007 -September 30, 2008, for the completion of the City’s Analysis of Impediments.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds were utilized to fund this effort.
5 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Incorporated on May 13, 2003, the City of Miami Gardens is the 33rd city in Miami-Dade County and is the third largest city in the County. Since the City is a
relatively new jurisdiction, historical census date is unavailable. Non-Hispanic Blacks comprise the largest demographic group while Hispanics represent the second largest demographic
group. The city’s Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White population continues to be highly concentrated. The City also has significant numbers of persons with disabilities (14.3%) and families
with children (24%). Increased education and outreach efforts are indicated to make protected classes of people under fair housing laws aware of their rights and where to seek assistance
should they feel their rights have been violated. It is estimated that there were a total of 30,989 housing units in the City of Miami Gardens in 2000, consisting of 23,567 single-family
and 7,179 multiple-family units, and 243 mobile home/other units. Of the 30,989 total units reported in the 2000 Census, an estimated 29,262 (94.4%) were occupied, with 5.6% (1,726)
classified as vacant. Of the total occupied units, approximately 22,052, or 75%, were owner-occupied, while 7,210, 25%, were renter occupied. Miami Gardens is an urban community that
is 93% built out with a forecasted 8% increase in population growth by 2010. The City experienced a tremendous increase in housing prices and rental rates between 2000 and 2006, reducing
the availability of affordable housing for the community-at-large and for its low to moderate income residents particularly. Approximately 48% of the total renters in 2000 paid less
than 30% of household income for gross housing costs. Approximately 58% of the total owners with a mortgage in 2000, paid less than 30% of household income for gross housing costs. Housing
discrimination complaints, fair housing litigation, and other data indicate discriminatory housing practices occurring in and around the jurisdiction. There is a need for on-going housing
provider training and support of public and private fair housing enforcement. Analyzed 2006 HMDA data clearly shows a trend with respect to low numbers of Black applicants and low-and
moderate-income applicants, as well as higher levels of denials of loans to Black and low-income applicants. The majority of the FHA loans originated (for which income could be determined)
were made to middle-and upper-income applicants. Overall, Blacks and Hispanic are underrepresented in loan applications and originations for all loan types. The disparities in lending
practices indicate a need for industry training in Fair Housing and Fair Lending laws and consumer education regarding lending processes and avoiding abusive practices. The following
Fair Housing Implications identified during the data gather process: 1. The increasing population indicates the need for on-going educational efforts in the jurisdiction.
6 2. The significant number of households with children under 18 years and disabled population indicate a need for educating these populations regarding their rights under federal, state,
and local fair housing laws; particularly reasonable accommodations, reasonable modifications, and accessible design and construction. 3. The presence of a significant Hispanic population
and persons who are foreign born indicate the need for culturally competent, multi-lingual fair housing information and services. 4. The receipt of CDBG funding from HUD suggests the
need for the governing body of the jurisdiction to receive training to ensure that the City’s mandated obligation to affirmatively further fair housing extends to all housing and housing-related
activities in its jurisdiction, whether publicly or privately funded. 5. The results of the Fair Housing Survey conducted in the City of Miami Gardens support the need for an on-going
effort to educate the community regarding their rights under fair housing laws and where to file such complaints. 6. A review of housing discrimination complaints indicates the need
for on-going and increased enforcement and educational efforts. 7. Miami Dade County’s Fair Housing Ordinance has not obtained substantial equivalency certification from HUD. Such certification
presents numerous advantages such as funding availability, local complaint processing under a substantially equivalent law, and opportunities for partnerships that affirmatively further
fair housing. 8. Disparities in lending practices indicate a need for industry training in Fair Housing and Fair Lending laws and consumer education regarding lending processes and avoiding
abusive practices. Having completed its examination of all available data, HOPE, Inc. concludes that there are five (5) impediments to fair housing choice evident in the City of Miami
Gardens: 1. Violations of federal, state, and local fair housing laws in the jurisdiction and immediate surrounding areas 2. Lack of awareness of fair housing laws, issues issues and
resources 3. Racial disparities in fair and equal lending 4. A strongly segregated housing market 5. Limited funding availability for the creation of affordable housing opportunities
Recommendations for corrective action have been made in the Fair Housing Plan that is provided herein.
7 III. JURISDICTIONAL DEMOGRAPHIC/BACKGROUND DATA The City of Miami Gardens was incorporated on May 13, 2003, as the 33rd city in Miami-Dade County and is the third largest city in the
County. The City is located in North-Central Miami-Dade County and covers an area of approximately 20 square miles. Miami Gardens borders Broward County to the north, the City of Miami
Lakes and Unincorporated Miami-Dade County to the west, the City of Opa-Locka to the south, and the City of North Miami Beach and Unincorporated Miami-Dade County to the east. The new
City of Miami Gardens is comprised of seven communities identified as Census Designated Places (CDP) in the 2000 Census: Andover CDP, portions of Carol City CDP, Scott Lake CDP, portions
of Norland CDP, portions of Lake Lucerne CDP, Opa-Locka North CDP, and Bunche Park CDP. The City of Miami Gardens is an urban/suburban community that was heavily developed between 1950
and 1969. It is a solid, working and middle class community of unique diversity and holds the distinction of being the largest predominantly African-American municipality in the State
of Florida. (See Attachment 1-Map, City of Miami Gardens) A. Population According to the City’s Consolidated Plan, the city had an estimated population of 105,414 as of 2004. The City
is reported to be 77% non-Hispanic Black, 16% Hispanic, 4% White non-Hispanic, and 3% other. The City’s official website estimates its population to have grown to 107,579 as of 2006
and indicates an increase in the Black population from 77% to 79%; a decrease in White-non Hispanic and Other from 7% to 5%; and no change in the 16 % Hispanic population. The city’s
Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White populations are highly concentrated in the northeast and northwest areas of the city. (See Attachment 2-Map, racial demographic by census block group.)
According to the 2006 American Community Survey2, 14.3% (12,160) of the city’s population of persons 5 years and older claimed some form of disability. Approximately 24% (21,658) of
the city’s population is under the age of 18 and there are 7,316 (24%) family households with children. The 2006 American Survey also estimates that approximately 28% (25,143) of the
population are foreign born. Based on the US Census of 2000, the Miami-Dade County Planning Department estimated the population of Miami Gardens at 100,809 residents in 2000. City projections
indicate that the City’s population will increase to 112,389 residents by 2016. Of the total growth during the period 2000–2016, approximately 52% are projected to be of prime working
age, while prime school-age children are projected to account for approximately 28%. Growth in the retirement age group is projected to constitute a fairly 2 The 2006 American Community
Survey estimates a total population of 90,741. This number is used in determining percentages of various populations for the purposes of this analysis.
8 small share (approximately 13.5% of the total). POPULATION ESTIMATES & PROJECTIONS -PER U.S.CENSUS DATA 2000-2030 (as listed on the official City of Miami Gardens website) 2000 100,809
2004 105,414 4.57% 2006 107,567 1.14% 2010 112,762 5.71% 5.71% 2015 119,260 5.71% 5.71% 2020 126,132 5.71% 5.71% 2025 133,400 5.71% 5.71% 2030 141,087 5.71% 5.71% Fair Housing Implications:
The increasing population indicates the need for on-going educational efforts in the jurisdiction. The significant number of households with children under 18 years and disabled population
indicate a need for educating these populations regarding their rights under federal, state, and local fair housing laws; particularly reasonable accommodations, reasonable modifications,
and accessible design and construction. The presence of a significant Hispanic population and persons who are foreign born indicate the need for culturally competent, multi-lingual fair
housing information and services.
9 B. Income Approximately 11,151 households in the City of Miami Gardens earn 80% of the area median income or less, and are therefore classified as low income by HUD. This represents
about 38% of the citywide population for whom household income could be determined. 3 According to U.S. Census information, in 2000 the city's median household income was $33,872, while
Miami-Dade County registered at $41,237, and the United States came in at $41,994. Median household income was lower than the median family income ($44,798) because a greater share of
non-family households has only a single wage earner, while families often have two. Income: Source US Census INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2006 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Total households
30,817 +/-2,262 Less than $10,000 3,826 +/-1,154 $10,000 to $14,999 1,519 +/-742 $15,000 to $24,999 5,630 +/-1,383 $25,000 to $34,999 4,970 +/-1,133 $35,000 to $49,999 4,068 +/-990 $50,000
to $74,999 6,331 +/-1,301 $75,000 to $99,999 2,620 +/-912 $100,000 to $149,999 1,266 +/-479 $150,000 to $199,999 384 +/-245 $200,000 or more 203 +/-334 Median household income (dollars)
33,872 +/-3,993 Mean household income (dollars) 43,554 +/-3,790 With earnings 24,565 +/-1,936 Mean earnings (dollars) 45,148 +/-4,270 With Social Security 10,013 +/-1,477 Mean Social
Security income (dollars) 11,190 +/-925 With retirement income 3,515 +/-944 Mean retirement income (dollars) 18,617 +/-4,751 With Supplemental Security Income 1,695 +/-667 Mean Supplemental
Security Income (dollars) 5,456 +/-983 With cash public assistance income 978 +/-521 Mean cash public assistance income (dollars) 1,922 +/-875 With Food Stamp benefits in the past 12
months 6,715 +/-1,108 3 City of Miami Gardens Consolidated Plan
10 Families 20,848 +/-1,912 Less than $10,000 1,566 +/-748 $10,000 to $14,999 750 +/-520 $15,000 to $24,999 3,220 +/-1,132 $25,000 to $34,999 3,015 +/-925 $35,000 to $49,999 3,097 +/-865
$50,000 to $74,999 5,221 +/-1,100 $75,000 to $99,999 2,619 +/-965 $100,000 to $149,999 1,106 +/-456 $150,000 to $199,999 254 +/-193 $200,000 or more 0 +/-300 Median family income (dollars)
44,798 +/-5,600 Mean family income (dollars) 49,566 +/-4,245 Per capita income (dollars) 15,667 +/-1,473 Non-Family households 9,969 +/-1,869 Median non-family income (dollars) 21,977
+/-2,648 Mean non-family income (dollars) 25,845 +/-3,686 Median earnings for workers (dollars) 22,820 +/-1,989 Median earnings for male full-time, year-round workers (dollars) 28,860
+/-3,471 Median earnings for female full-time, year-round workers (dollars) 28,367 +/-3,317 C. Employment According to the City’s 2000 Demographic Profile, 62.2% of the population 16
years and over were participants in the labor force, of which 45% were male and 55% were female. Miami Garden’s employment rate was comparable to the County’s (62%), higher than the
State’s (58.6%), but slightly lower than the nation (63.9%). Educational services, healthcare, and the social assistance industry were the categories most represented. Employment EMPLOYMENT
STATUS Population 16 years and over 71,657 +/-5,824 In labor force 44,618 +/-4,428 Civilian labor force 44,575 +/-4,416 Employed 38,901 +/-3,857 Unemployed 5,674 +/-1,680 Armed Forces
43 +/-72 Not in labor force 27,039 +/-3,488 Civilian labor force 44,575 +/-4,416 Unemployed 12.7% +/-3.3 Females 16 years and over 39,947 +/-3,857
11 In labor force 24,628 +/-2,998 Civilian labor force 24,628 +/-2,998 Employed 21,784 +/-2,563 Own children under 6 years 6,039 +/-1,453 All parents in family in labor force 4,505 +/-1,428
Own children 6 to 17 years 13,209 +/-2,800 All parents in family in labor force 10,574 +/-2,613 COMMUTING TO WORK Workers 16 years and over 38,196 +/-3,803 Car, truck, or van --drove
alone 31,593 +/-3,707 Car, truck, or van --carpooled 2,545 +/-782 Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 2,789 +/-959 Walked 327 +/-251 Other means 549 +/-407 Worked at home 393 +/-344
Mean travel time to work (minutes) 29.9 +/-2.0 Civilian employed population 16 years and over 38,901 +/-3,857 OCCUPATION Management, professional, and related occupations 9,899 +/-1,733
Service occupations 10,497 +/-1,971 Sales and office occupations 10,044 +/-2,010 Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations 0 +/-300 Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair
occupations 3,449 +/-958 Production, transportation, and material moving occupations 5,012 +/-+/-1,212 INDUSTRY Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 0 +/-300 Construction
3,241 +/-1,325 Manufacturing 1,536 +/-604 Wholesale trade 1,367 +/-613 Retail trade 3,282 +/-1,088 Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 3,967 +/-1,126 Information 744 +/-388
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 2,004 +/-923 Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 3,905 +/-1,126 Educational
services, and health care, and social assistance 11,609 +/-1,993 Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation, and food services 2,653 +/-921 Other services, except public
administration 2,182 +/-788 Public administration 2,411 +/-813 CLASS OF WORKER Private wage and salary workers 27,166 +/-3,477 Government workers 8,638 +/-1,650 Self-employed workers
in own not incorporated business 3,097 +/-1,127 Unpaid family workers 0 +/-300 D. Housing (City of Miami Gardens Consolidated Plan 2006-2011 and Comprehensive
12 Development Master Plan-Housing Element) It is estimated that there were a total of 30,989 housing units in the City of Miami Gardens in 2000, consisting of 23,567 single-family and
7,179 multiple-family units, and 243 mobile home/other units. Single-family attached and detached homes constituted approximately 76% of the total. The City’s housing breakdown by type
is typical of most cities with 76% consisting of single-family units and 24% multiple-family units including mobile homes and “other” units. Of the 30,989 total units reported in the
2000 Census, an estimated 29,262 (94.4%) were occupied, with 5.6% (1,726) classified as vacant. Of the total occupied units, approximately 22,052, or 75%, were owner-occupied, while
7,210, 25%, were renter occupied. Historical building permit data is not available to determine the current number of housing units, given the City’s incorporation in 2003; however,
it is estimated that there were 32,789 dwelling units in the City as of 2005. By age of structure, approximately 52% of the housing stock was built between 1950 and 1969, while approximately
88% was constructed between 1950 and 1989.
In 2000 the median monthly rent for renter-occupied units in the City was approximately $670, compared to $647 per month for Miami-Dade County, with 59% of all City rents falling within
the $500 to $899 per month range. In 2006 the average City rental rates rose to the $900 to $1200 range, representing an 80% increase over the previous five years. Similarly, the value
of owner-occupied Miami Gardens units skyrocketed by 120% from 2000 to 2005. The estimated median home value was $88,500 in 2000, compared to $124,000 for Miami-Dade, with approximately
79% of owner-occupied units valued at less than $100,000 in the City. In 2005, the median home price for a single family home in Miami Gardens rose to $195,000. State of the Cities Data
System (SOCDS) figures prepared by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) were used to estimate the 2000 distribution of households households in Miami Gardens, by
tenure (i.e. renters and owners), among very low, low and moderate+ income groups, according to the following distribution: Renters: Very Low Income 9.1% Low Income 5.4% Moderate+ Income
10.1% Owners: Very Low Income 12.3% Low Income 11.8% Moderate+ Income 51.3% Total 100.0% Approximately 48% of the total renters in 2000 paid less than 30% of household income for gross
housing costs. Further approximately 58% of the total owners with a mortgage in 2000, paid less than 30% of household income for gross housing costs. Based upon the Department of Community
Affairs standard, these figures indicate that a majority of the housing within the City was affordable to its residents.
13 Rental Housing Cost Burden As anticipated, residents within the very low-income category are severely impacted by the cost of rental housing in the City of Miami Gardens. In the very
low-income category, 71% of large related familiy renters are facing severe cost burden (housing costs that exceed 50% of household income), followed by 66% of “other houseolds”, 65%
of small related families , and 57% of elderly renters. In the low income category, the severity of the cost burden decreases slightly, with a smaller percentage of the population facing
severe housing cost burden. In this income category, however, 84% of both the large and small related families are facing rental housing cost burden (housing costs that exceed 30% of
household income), followed by 70% of “other households”, and 57% of elderly renters. Similarly, the cost burden continues to decrease within the moderate-income category with 64% of
“other households” facing rental housing cost burdens, followed by 62% of large and small related families, and 42% of elderly renters. Owner Occupied Housing Cost Burden In the homeowner
population, the cost burden is less severe than with renters. However, across all income catergories, a high percentage of home owners are experiencing cost burden that exceed 30%. In
the very low-income category, the large related family is the most severely impacted with 75% experiencing cost burden, followed by 74% of the elderly, 71% of small related families,
and 51% of “other households”. In the low-income category, the “other households” population and the large related family are the most severely impacted with 87% experiencing cost burden
exceeding 30%, followed by 86% of the small related families, and 71% of the elderly. In the moderate-income category, the “other households” category is the most severly impacted with
82% experiencing cost burden, follwed by 70% of the small related families, 59% of the large related families, and 48% of the elderly. Housing Problems An average of 77% of both renters
and homeowners in the very low, low, and moderateincome categories are experiencing housing problems. These problems range from overcrowded conditions to deteriorated structures. The
City of Miami Gardens conducted research regarding the overall status of housing in the City as a part of the City’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan. During this process, several
factors were examined in order to define a housing unit as standard or sub-standard. There are several measures which can be used to evaluate housing stock and living conditions within
the City, including age of structure, overcrowding, lack of certain necessary facilities, structural integrity, and Florida Building Code requirements. Specific indicators of substandard
housing or living conditions for each of the above measures are as follows:
14 • Age of Structure: A housing unit constructed prior to 1950, which is valued at less than $25,000. According to analysis conducted by the Iler Planning Group, there are 1,384 units
(4.5% of the housing stock) within the City that were constructed prior to 1950. The analysis also uncovered 1,036 specified owner-occupied units (5.3% of the total) in Miami Gardens
valued at less than $50,000 in 2000. • Lacking Facilities: A housing unit lacking complete plumbing facilities, heating and cooking facilities, and/or complete kitchen facilities. The
2000 Census reported that high percentages of the year-round housing stock had complete plumbing facilities (99.3%) and complete kitchen facilities (99.3%). Due to the high level of
availability, it is concluded that “lack of facilities” does not, in itself, raise any issues regarding overall substandard living and housing conditions within the City. • Over-Crowding:
1.01 persons per room or more within a dwelling unit. According to the 2000 Census, there were an estimated 5,345 households, or 18.3% of the total, reporting occupancy of more than
1.0 person per room in the City. • External Housing Conditions: A housing unit categorized as either of the following by the City of Miami Gardens. • Deteriorated: Meaning in need of
some relatively minor exterior repair, which is indicative of a lack of maintenance. Examples include: housing that requires painting, fascias and soffits showing signs of deterioration,
cracked and broken windows, and even severely overgrown yards, which is generally accompanied by a lack of structural maintenance. • Dilapidated: Meaning in need of substantial rehabilitation.
The unit may be considered to be unfit for human habitation or rapidly approaching that condition. This category of substandard housing needs to be addressed immediately, through either
rehabilitation or demolition, as the health and safety of the inhabitants may be endangered. City staff has not completed a general survey oriented to evaluating external housing conditions
since incorporation in 2003. • Code Violations: The City has adopted the Florida Building Code (Miami-Dade & Broward Edition) that incorporates the following definition for an unsafe
structure: 1. A building deemed a fire hazard, as a result of debris or other combustible material, creates a hazard, vacant and unguarded; or 2. A building deemed structurally unsafe
by design or deterioration, partially destroyed, unsafe or lack of adequate plumbing, inadequate or unsafe electrical, inadequate waste disposal system or lack of a building permit.
15 The analysis conducted by the City concluded that, while “age of structure” and “value,” in combination, do not raise any immediate issues regarding overall substandard living and
housing conditions, vigilant code enforcement and conservation efforts will need to be undertaken as a means to preserve the City’s affordable housing stock. Age and value of the housing
stock may become a concern in the near future if the City does not dedicate resources to conservation and preservation measures. Gven significant increases in home values and rental
rates since the 2000 Census, increases in housing production costs, the current mortgage and credit crisis and the continued reduction of federal funding to local jurisdictions, the
City’s ability to produce affordable housing opportunities for its residents will be adversely impacted. Fair Housing Implications: Limited availability of affordable housing allows
landlords and owners to be more selective when renting and selling, opening the door to discriminatory housing practices. Publicly funded or subsidized housing opportunities must be
affirmatively marketed to ensure availability to residents of all communities. E. Government Structure The City has a “Mayor-Council-Manager” form of government. The City Council is
vested with all legislative powers of the City. The Council consists of the Mayor and six (6) Council members. The Mayor is a voting member of the Council and presides over the meetings
of the Council. The City Manager is the chief administrative officer of the City and is responsible to the Council for the administration of all City affairs and is responsible for carrying
out the policies adopted by the Council4 (See Attachment 3-City of Miami Gardens Organizational Chart) The Consolidated Plan regulations (24 CFR 91) require that the City of Miami Gardens
complete the Fair Housing Planning, which includes the completion of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. The City of Miami Gardens City Council acts as the final authority
for the appropriation of funds for Annual Action Plan activities under the Consolidated Plan grant programs, following the recommendations of the City Manager. The City of Miami Gardens
Community Development Department is the lead administrative agency for the Consolidated Plan programs. The Department provides fiscal and regulatory oversight of all CDBG funding, as
well as other federal and state grants for housing, economic, and community development. 4 City of Miami Gardens, City Charter
16 Fair Housing Implication: The receipt of CDBG funding from HUD suggests the need for the governing body of the jurisdiction to receive training to ensure that the City’s mandated
obligation to affirmatively further fair housing extends to all housing and housing-related activities in its jurisdiction, whether publicly or privately funded. IV. JURISDICTION’S FAIR
HOUSING PROFILE A. Fair Housing Complaints The National Fair Housing Alliance’s 2008 Fair Housing Trends Report announced that 27,023 fair housing complaints were filed nationwide in
2007.5 According to the report, this number represents less than one percent of the estimated incidence of illegal housing discrimination that occurs each year in the United States.
Further, the report estimates that private fair housing organizations process approximately 60% more complaints than public entities. The report indicates that for the past few years,
disability as a basis for discrimination has dominated the complaint load nationally. In Miami-Dade County and in the City of Miami Gardens, has been and continues to be the most common
basis of discrimination complained of. From March 10, 2005, through June 30, 2008, HOPE, Inc. received a total of 48 complaints from the following zip codes: 33054, 33055, 33056 and
33169. The majority of the complaints (27 or 56%) were from rental transactions. A total of 15 (31%) were from lending transactions. The balance of the complaints stemmed from sales
(5 or 10%) and insurance (1 or 2%) transactions. Race was the most common basis of discrimination complained of (28 or 58%). Disability was the second most common basis of discrimination
complained of (10 or 21%), follow by familial status (5 or 13%), national origin (3 or 8%). 5 http://www.nationalfairhousing.org/FairHousingResources/tabid/2555/Default.aspx
Disability Familial Status National Race/Color Familial Status Other State & Local Lending Rental Case by Basis Race/Color Disability Familial Status National Origin Religion Sex Other,
State & Local Total Race/Color Origin Other State & Local Disability National Origin Rental Sales Insurance Sales Lending Insurance Case by Issue 28 Rental 27 10 Sales 5 5 Advertising
3 Lending 15 Insurance 1 Zoning: Disability 1 Zoning: Other 48 48 17
18 B. Fair Housing Discrimination Suits Filed Hicks, et al. v. Rebuilding Our Community, et al.6 Three African-American families, who were first-time home buyers, signed contracts to
purchase and had their homes sold to white, Hispanic buyers. The developer was sued for housing discrimination on the basis of race and breach of contract. The homes, subject to the
lawsuit, are located in areas neighboring Florida Memorial College which is located in the City of Miami Gardens. It is uncertain as to whether or not the homes are actually located
inside of the City’s boundaries. The case settled in mediation. The amount and terms of settlement are confidential. Milsap, et al. v. Cornerstone Residential Management7 The developer
and property management company of affordable housing units located in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties is subject to a class action lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of familial
status and race. Four properties subject to this lawsuit are located in the City of Miami Gardens: Crossings @University, 18740 N.W. 27 Ave, 33055 Eagle's Landing, 18800 N.W 27 Ave,
33055 Hidden Cove, 1030 N.W. 155 Lane, 33169 Golden Lakes, 1200 N.W. 155 Lane, 33169 The plaintiffs allege that the occupancy restrictions established and enforced by Cornerstone have
a discriminatory impact on families with children and Blacks. US HUD has established a general rule of two persons per bedroom as a reasonable occupancy standard for purposes of the
Fair Housing Act.8 The plaintiffs allege that the occupancy standards enforced at properties owned and operated by Cornerstone are more restrictive than that established by HUD, thus
having a discriminatory impact on families with children. Further alleged is that properties located in areas with larger minority populations have even more restrictive occupancy limitations
than areas with smaller minority populations, resulting in racial disparities. 6 Filed in 2005 by the Florida Justice Institute in the United States District Court, Southern District
of Florida, Civil Division, Case No. 05-20083-CIV 7 Filed in 2005 by The Law Office of Matthew Dietz in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Civil Division,
Case No. 05-60038 CIV 8 Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Enforcement-Occupancy Standards, Notice of Statement of Policy, Docket No. FR-4405-N-01; Federal Register/Vol.
63, No. 245/Tuesday, December 22, 1998/Notices
19 The case is pending. Guzman, et al v. Raquetclub, LLC., et al.9 A visually impaired woman and companion allege that a property with a “no pet” policy refused to allow her to apply
to rent an apartment because of her guide dog. Twin Lakes Racquet Club Apartments is located at 777 NW 155 Lane, 33169, just outside of the City of Miami Garden’s boundaries. The case
is pending. C. Reasons for Trends or Patterns A major awareness study, “How much do we know? “ released by U.S.HUD in April 2002, Public Awareness of the Nation’s Fair Housing Laws10,
provides evidence of an underreporting of housing discrimination in the country. The study provides the results of the first national survey and analysis of public awareness of fair
housing laws. Although the survey did not quantitatively assess the extent of housing discrimination, respondents were asked did they feel that they had ever been discriminated against
when trying to buy or rent a house or apartment. According to the study, fourteen percent (14%) of the respondents, more than 28 million people, believed that they had experienced some
form of housing discrimination. Of that fourteen percent, less than one-fifth of the people took action, and most simply complained to the individual who they believed discriminated
against them. The survey results imply “a much greater incidence of perceived housing discrimination among the general public than a tally of complaints by government agencies, fair
housing groups, or the legal system indicate.” The study emphasized a widespread lack of public awareness of the nation’s fair housing laws. On-going education and outreach efforts are
essential to promote awareness of rights conferred under fair housing laws and to ensure compliance with fair housing laws. In an effort to gauge the current local level of housing discrimination,
a Fair Housing Survey was conducted throughout the City of Miami Gardens. In August and September 2008, HOPE, Inc. conducted a survey that posed a series of questions to local residents
regarding housing discrimination, tenant/homeowner rights, and local fair housing resources. Steps were taken to ensure a random and widespread response from residents within Miami Gardens.
Surveys were conducted at local community events, through direct community outreach to local businesses and residential areas, as well as, through phone and fax contacts with local religious
organizations. 100 surveys were collected through all of these efforts. 9 Filed in 2005 by The Law Office of Matthew Dietz in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida,
Civil Division, Case No. 06-24037-CA-08 10 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, available on www.huduser.org
20 Extent of perceived discrimination and trends in awareness: In Miami Gardens, thirty-four percent of residents surveyed claimed to have experienced or know someone who has experienced
some type of housing discrimination. Yet, only one percent of those believing to have experienced housing discrimination had taken any action in response. These are important issues
because the Fair Housing Act relies on homebuyers or renters knowing enough to recognize housing discrimination when it occurs and, if experienced, to initiate a response-like filing
a formal complaint for investigation, conciliation, or adjudication with local and national organizations, such as HOPE, Inc. Education is essential to this process. Fifty-three percent
of Miami Garden residents admitted to an unfamiliarity with fair housing laws and the individual rights of renters and homeowners. Also, sixty-one percent of those surveyed were unaware
of the resources available for filing discrimination complaints. Education and outreach are the main sources for dispersing such information throughout local communities. Grassroots
organizations traditionally play the role of local informer and trusted resource. In fact, over sixty percent of the 27,023 housing discrimination complaints filed in 2007 were taken
by private organizations. Although national complaint numbers appear extreme, the National Fair Housing Alliance asserts that, “the number of complaints filed, however, still represents
less than one percent of the annual incidence of discrimination.” One cause for the low numbers of reported complaints is the insidious nature of housing discrimination. Since the Fair
Housing Act made housing discrimination illegal, massive resistance to integration evolved from blatant to covert practices. Therefore, identifying housing discrimination requires an
understanding of specific terms and practices that otherwise appear legal. HOPE, Inc. specializes in the diversification of outreach and education efforts in order to inform larger numbers
of local residents about current trends in housing discrimination. HOPE, Inc. targets residents by participating in community events, housing workshops, educational programs, specific
residential and business outreach, and other such activities. The 2005 National Fair Housing Trends Report noted that rental grievances represent the largest category of complaints for
housing discrimination. HOPE, Inc. discrimination complaints show that a major element in rental housing discrimination is a lack of provider education and awareness regarding their
responsibility to comply with federal, Survey Impediments unfamiliar with fair housing laws 53% unfamiliar with fair housing resources 61% unfamiliar with problems facing minorities
in housing 58%
21 state, and local fair housing laws. Therefore, HOPE, Inc. targets housing providers and entitlement jurisdiction employees for training and certification in fair housing laws and
practices. Trends in home buying practices: Mortgages Sixty-two percent of Miami-Garden residents surveyed admitted to being unaware of the problems facing blacks and Hispanics in securing
a mortgage. This is a major concern, since predatory lenders historically target minorities and their communities. The Center for Community Change reported that African Americans are
three times as likely as whites to finance their homes with sub-prime loans; this is true even between upperincome blacks and whites. In fact, over twenty percent of the sub-prime loans
given went to people who met the Fannie Mae requirements for a regular loan. Twenty-two percent of Miami Garden residents reported that they or someone they knew were offered an overly
expensive home loan. Steering Nineteen percent of Miami Garden residents experienced steering when purchasing a home. The National Fair Housing Alliance in cooperation with HUD conducted
a two and half year national investigation that revealed a steering rate of 87% for minorities when viewing homes for purchase. Therefore, it is likely that some residents surveyed were
unaware of the actual practice of steering. Again, preventative measures must include education. Residential Segregation In Miami Gardens, thirty-one percent of surveyors believed that
their neighborhoods were segregated by race and ethnic groups. The U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Race Discrimination issued a report in January 2008 that noted: [P]ersistence
and prevalence of housing segregation throughout the United States…The average white person in metropolitan America lives in a neighborhood that is 80% white and only 7% black. In stark
contrast, ‘a typical black individual lives in a neighborhood that is only 33% white and as much as 51% black,’ making African Americans the most residentially segregated group in the
United States. Generally, it appears that Miami Gardens would benefit from fair housing education and outreach efforts. Basic Survey Results:
22 1. Are you Familiar with the fair housing laws and your rights as a renter/homeowner? 47% answered “yes”; 53% answered “No” or “I don’t know” 2. Have you are anyone you know ever
experienced housing discrimination? 34% answered “yes”, 66% answered “No” 3. Do you know what agencies to contact for information on your fair housing rights or assistance in reporting
housing discrimination? 39% answered “yes”, 61% answered “No” or “I don’t know” 4. I have filed a discrimination complaint with an agency or in court: 99% answered “No”, 1% answered
“Yes” 5. Are neighborhoods segregated by race and ethnic groups within the City of Miami Gardens? 69% answered “No”; 31% answered “Yes” 6. Have you experienced discrimination in getting
a mortgage or property insurance? 91% answered “No”; 9% answered “Yes” 7. Have you or anyone you know been denied the opportunity or steered away from buying or renting in a particular
neighborhood? 19% answered “Yes”; 81% answered “No” 8. Have you or anyone you know been offered a more more expensive home loan than you feel you qualified for? 22% answered “Yes”; 78%
answered “No” 9. Are you aware of problems faced by Blacks or Hispanics in securing a mortgage loan? 38% answered “Yes”; 62% answered “No” 10. What would you say is the best thing about
living in your neighborhood? 36% answered “Good Mix of People”; 22% answered “Convenience”; 18% answered “Near work”; 8% answered “Scenery”; 8% answered “Family 11. What would you say
is the worst thing about the neighborhood or place that you live? 25% answered “Pollution”; 38% answered “Nothing”; 3% answered “Neighbors”; 4% answered “Scenery”; 4% answered “Crime”;
4% answered “Too many children”; 5% answered “Not convenient” Fair Housing Implications: The results of the Fair Housing Survey conducted in the City of Miami Gardens support the need
for an on-going effort to educate the community regarding their rights under fair housing laws and where to file such complaints. A review of housing discrimination complaints indicates
the need for on-on-going and increased enforcement and educational efforts.
23 V. JURISDICTION’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE A. Fair Housing Enforcement Federal The Federal Fair Housing Act11 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion,
sex, familial status, and disability. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, is charged with enforcing the Federal Fair Housing
Act. The Act contains administrative enforcement mechanisms, with HUD attorneys bringing actions before administrative law judges on behalf of victims of housing discrimination, and
gives the Justice Department jurisdiction to bring suit on behalf of victims in Federal district courts. In connection with prohibitions on discrimination against individuals with disabilities,
the Act contains design and construction accessibility provisions for certain new multifamily dwellings developed for first occupancy on or after March 13, 1991. HUD has had a lead role
in administering the Fair Housing Act since its adoption in 1968. The 1988 amendments, however, have greatly increased the Department's enforcement role. First, the newly protected classes
have proven significant sources of new complaints. Second, HUD's expanded enforcement role took the Department beyond investigation and conciliation into the mandatory enforcement area.
Complaints filed with HUD are investigated by the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO). If the complaint is not successfully conciliated, then FHEO determines whether
reasonable cause exists to believe that a discriminatory housing practice has occurred. Where reasonable cause is found, the parties to the complaint are notified by HUD's issuance of
a Determination, as well as a Charge of Discrimination, and a hearing is scheduled before a HUD administrative law judge. Either party --complainant or respondent --may cause the HUD-scheduled
administrative proceeding to be terminated by electing instead to have the matter litigated in Federal court. Whenever a party has so elected, the Department of Justice takes over HUD's
role as counsel seeking resolution of the charge on behalf of aggrieved persons, and the matter proceeds as a civil action. Either form of action --the ALJ proceeding or the civil action
in Federal district court --is subject to review in the U. S. Court of Appeals. 12 State The Florida Fair Housing Act13 was passed by the Florida Legislature in 1983, and amended in
1989. The Florida Fair Housing Act parallels the Federal Fair Housing Act. 11 Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, 42USC3601 12 www.hud.gov/fairhousing 13 State of Florida, Civil
Rights Statutes, Title XLIX, Chapter760.2
24 The Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) is a Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP) agency and enforces Florida’s state fair housing law. Substantial equivalency certification
takes place when a State or local agency applies for certification and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) determines that the agency enforces a law that provides
substantive rights, procedures, remedies and judicial review provisions that are substantially equivalent to the federal Fair Housing Act. HUD has a two-phase procedure for the determination
of substantial equivalency certification. In the first phase, the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity determines whether, "on its face," the State or local law
provides rights, procedures, remedies and judicial review provisions that are substantially equivalent to the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative conclusion that the State or local
law is substantially equivalent on its face will result in HUD offering the agency interim certification. Interim certification is for a term of three years. An agency must obtain interim
certification prior to obtaining certification. In the second phase, the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity determines whether, "in operation," the State or local
law provides rights, procedures, remedies and the availability of judicial review that are substantially equivalent to the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative conclusion that the
State or local law is substantially equivalent both on its face and in operation will result in HUD offering the agency certification. Certification is for a term of five years. During
the five years of certification, the agency's ability to maintain certification will be assessed. After the five years of certification, if the Assistant Secretary determines that the
agency still qualifies for certification, HUD will renew the agency's certification
for another five years. Substantially equivalent agencies are eligible to participate in the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP). FHAP permits HUD to use the services of substantially
equivalent State and local agencies in the enforcement of fair housing laws, and to reimburse these agencies for services that assist in carrying out the spirit and letter of the federal
Fair Housing Act. While certification results in a shift in fair housing enforcement power from the federal government to the State or locality, the substantive and procedural strength
of the federal Fair Housing Act is not compromised. Prior to certification, an agency must demonstrate to HUD that it enforces a law that is substantially equivalent to the federal Fair
Housing Act. When HUD receives a complaint and the complaint alleges violations of a State or local fair housing law administered by an interim certified or certified agency, HUD will
generally refer the complaint to the agency for investigation, conciliation and enforcement activities. Fair housing professionals being based in the locality where the alleged discrimination
occurred benefits all parties to a housing discrimination complaint. These individuals often have a greater familiarity with local housing stock and are in closer proximity to the site
of the alleged discrimination, offering greater efficiency in case processing.
25 Local Miami-Dade County's civil and human rights ordinance14 is codified as Chapter 11A of the Miami-Dade County Code, as amended. The ordinance prohibits discrimination against any
person in Miami-Dade County in the area of employment, public accommodations, credit and financing practices, and housing accommodations on the basis of race, color, religion, ancestry,
national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, marital status, familial status or sexual orientation. The Miami-Dade County Equal Opportunity Board (MDCEOB) is a quasi-judicial as
well as an advisory board charged with the enforcement of Miami-Dade County's civil and human rights ordinance. After the filing of a formal complaint of discrimination, the MDCEOB conducts
an investigation into the allegations raised in the charge. The investigation may entail the taking of testimony from the parties and witnesses, the inspection of documents, site visitations
to the respondent’s facilities and fact finding conferences. During this process, early early resolution is encouraged through settlement agreements. If the charge is not settled, the
MDCEOB issues a recommended determination of probable cause or no probable cause. Any of the parties to an investigation may appeal the staff’s determination to the members of the MDCEOB
at a public hearing. The board members, who may meet in hearing panels of three or more, may uphold, modify or overturn the staff’s determination. After a finding of discrimination,
the chairperson, with the approval of a quorum of the members, issues and adjudicative final order including, but not limited to; 1) hiring, reinstatement or promotion, with accrued
seniority and benefits, and with back pay; 2) taking affirmative action and making corrections; 3) requiring reasonable accommodations; 4) awarding costs and attorney’s fees to a prevailing
party; and 5) awarding and other quantifiable relief to a prevailing complainant for injuries incurred as a result of an act prohibited by Chapter 11A. Unlike the state fair housing
law, the Miami-Dade County ordinance currently does not have substantial equivalency certification from U.S. HUD. The ordinance was designated as substantially equivalent in 1983, but
has since lost the certification. Substantial equivalency certification results in housing discrimination cases having the benefit of State or local complaint processing. At the same
time, the process assures that the substantive and procedural strength of the federal Fair Housing Act will not be compromised. Private Housing Opportunities Project for Excellence (HOPE),
Inc. is a private, non-profit fair housing organization whose mission is to fight housing discrimination in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties and to ensure equal housing opportunities
throughout the state of Florida. HOPE was created by the Dade County Fair Housing and Employment Appeals Board (now the Miami-Dade County Equal Opportunity Board -MDCEOB) utilizing funding
from HUD’s Fair Housing Assistance Program, Type II grant. The organization has been engaged in testing for fair housing law violations, pursuing 14 Miami Dade County Ordinance No.90-32,
Chapter 11A, Article II
26 enforcement of meritorious claims and carrying out fair housing education and outreach and counseling programs designed to prevent and eliminate discriminatory housing practices in
Miami-Dade and Broward Counties for twenty (20) years. Incorporated in 1988, HOPE, Inc. has been an effective catalyst in fair housing education and outreach and the investigation and
preparation of housing discrimination complaints for resolution or litigation. HOPE’s Private Enforcement Initiatives are primarily funded by grants from US HUD’s Fair Housing Initiative
Program (FHIP). The main components of the initiative include: intake for complaint processing or referral, testing and additional investigation, where appropriate, and supervised referral
of enforcement proposals (complaints that have been reviewed for jurisdiction by applicable fair housing laws, supported with credible and legitimate evidence) for enforcement action.
HOPE, Inc. is the only entity in Miami-Dade and Broward counties engaged in “testing”. Testing Testing is a controlled method for measuring and documenting whether differences in the
quality, content, and quantity of information and services are given to various home seekers by housing providers. Testing is an effective and accurate tool in identifying policy or
procedural oversight or infraction that may require corrective action. For litigation or settlement of housing discrimination cases, HOPE, Inc. enlists private law firms and attorneys
to contribute their services, on a pro bono basis. While governmental entities/agencies represent the public interest, private fair housing groups are able to advocate for the individual
interests of victims of housing discrimination. There is no cost for legal representation or for any other service provided by HOPE to persons complaining of housing discrimination.
Agencies with substantial equivalency certification are eligible for funding that can be used to partner with private fair housing organizations. Such funding was once utilized by Miami-Dade
County to create HOPE, Inc., a private fair housing organization that has implemented a wide range of crucial services for diverse constituencies and has been instrumental in the recovery
of nearly $9 million in settlements for victims of housing discrimination. By drawing on the strengths of private and public fair housing organizations, such partnerships can result
in effective efforts to combat housing discrimination. Fair Housing Implication: Miami Dade County’s Fair Housing Ordinance has not obtained substantial equivalency certification from
HUD. Such certification presents numerous advantages such as funding availability, local complaint processing under a substantially equivalent law, and opportunities for partnerships
that affirmatively further fair housing.
27 B. Informational Programs HOPE, Inc. implements the only active, on-going Fair Housing Education & Outreach Initiative in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties. The Miami-Dade County Initiative
is funded, in significant part by five, of the six, Entitlement Jurisdiction’s located in Miami-Dade, County (Miami-Dade County, the Cities of Miami, Miami Beach, North Miami and Miami
Gardens) utilizing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Generally, private fair housing organizations like HOPE are better equipped to reach local communities and marginalized
people through continual outreach and partnerships with both secular and religious grassroots organizations. The organizations have the established reputations and private status that
promote more trust from local communities. Major Objectives: Provide educational materials, seminars and working sessions regarding protected classes and prohibited practices under federal,
state, and local fair housing laws; Provide comprehensive fair housing services while while seeking to identify illegal housing practices in the areas of rentals, sales, mortgage/lending,
insurance, and advertising; Assist Entitlement Jurisdictions in implementing Fair Housing Action Plans that are designed to eliminate identified impediments to Fair Housing Choice and
to meet Consolidated Plan requirements to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing; Conduct Private Housing Industry Provider Education Programs designed to furnish developers, real estate
brokers, property managers, financial institutions, and the media/advertising industry with the most current information necessary to fully comply with fair housing laws, Community Reinvestment
Act regulations, and affirmative marketing requirements. All programs are tailored to meet individual organizational needs. Public Housing Authority and Not-for-Profit Community Development
Corporation Workshops provide technical assistance to insure equal housing opportunities for all protected classes and the elimination of institutional barriers to decent, affordable
housing. The overarching objective of these activities is to assist communities to develop a coordinated strategy of actions to affirmatively further fair housing. Legal Community Seminars
offer practitioners training in fair housing litigation skills. Community and Civil Group Education Sessions are implemented to insure that the general public and protected classes become
knowledgeable about fair housing laws and the means available to seek redress for fair housing rights violations. Media Campaign informs the public regarding the fair housing services
made available by HOPE, Inc. utilizing any combination of public service announcements, print ads, signs/billboards, and the media. The Discrimination telephone Help Line provides information
regarding fair housing issues, referral services for victims of discrimination to file complaints and seek redress, and affordable housing and other housing related referrals. HOPE publishes
and disseminates a fair housing newsletter quarterly (circulation circulation of 3,500) highlighting national, statewide, and local fair housing news, and conducts national Fair Housing
Month activities in April annually.
28 C. Lending Policies and Practices Historically, different ethnic and racial groups have encountered barriers to full access to home mortgage lending. Typically, these barriers were
identified by higher rejection and failure rates for loan applications. In other instances, ethnic and minority groups have been steered to government-insured FHA (Federal Housing Administration)
loans when they could have qualified and benefited from conventional loans in the private market. The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac), the two federally-chartered secondary market enterprises that stimulate the mortgage markets by purchasing loans, are charged by the government with reaching
specific goals for serving both affordable and minority housing markets with conventional loans. This indicates the clear policy goal of reaching as many borrowers as possible through
private conventional markets. As the market of sub-prime lending has grown, studies by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and other researchers, as well as many lawsuits,
have raised the concern that ethnic and racial groups have been unfairly steered to these higher interest rate products when they could have been served by either conventional prime
loans or FHA lending. Thus, the key concerns presently raised about barriers to fair lending include both the impediments to access to conventional prime loans and the infusion of FHA
and sub-prime lending into minority markets. Accordingly, this analysis of barriers to full access to mortgage lending focuses on the issues of access to conventional prime loans and
steering to FHA and sub-prime loans in both the home purchase and refinance markets. 2006 Home Lending Analysis for Miami Gardens, FL HOPE, Inc. engaged the services of the National
Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) conduct a portfolio and market share analysis using 2006 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data with the following specifications for Miami
Gardens, FL: all single family (ASF) lending, conventional and government-insured, loans to owneroccupants, and first-lien loans. All single-family loans include loans for home purchase,
home improvement, and refinances. For the portfolio share analysis, NCRC evaluated the prime (or market-rate) and subprime (or high-cost) lending performances by gender; race and ethnicity
of borrower (i.e. white non-Hispanic, African American, Asian, or Hispanic); by income level of borrower (low-and moderate-income, or LMI, and middle-and upper-income, or MUI); by income
level of census tract (LMI or MUI neighborhood); and by minority level of census tract (substantially minority or substantially white census tract). High-cost loans are those with the
price information reported under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). For more information about HMDA, please visit www.ncrc.org. Lending patterns were then compared to the demographics
of Miami Gardens to illustrate potential lending disparities.
29 The market share analysis compares the portion of high-cost loans made to a particular borrower group to all loans (market-rate loans plus high-cost loans) made to that same borrower
group. The disparity ratio illustrates how much more often lenders made highcost loans to one borrower group compared to another. Market-rate loans are loans made at prevailing interest
rates to borrowers with good credit histories. High-cost loans, in contract, are loans with rates higher than prevailing rates made to borrowers with credit blemishes. The higher rates
compensate lenders for the added risks of lending to borrowers with credit blemishes. While responsible highcost lending serves legitimate credit needs, public policy concerns arise
when certain groups in the population receive a disproportionate amount of high-cost loans. When high-cost lending crowds out market-rate lending in traditionally underserved communities,
price discrimination and other predatory practices become more likely, as residents face fewer product choices. Portfolio Share Analysis of All Single Family Lending in Miami Gardens
While comprising about 20 percent of the households in Miami Gardens, FL, according to the Census 2000, Hispanic borrowers received 28.4 percent of prime and 29.5 percent of all high-cost
loans in the area in 2006. As a comparison, white non-Hispanic borrowers, whose share of the Pima County households was fewer than 10 percent, received 8.6 percent of all prime and 6.7
percent of all high-cost loans. Thus, white non-Hispanic borrowers received a smaller portion of prime and an even smaller portion of high-cost loans, as compared to their share of Miami
Garden’s households, while Hispanics received a significantly larger portion of both prime and high-cost loans than their share of households in the area (See Attachment 4-Table 1 and
Chart 1a). African-American borrowers comprised the largest share of households (67 percent) in Miami Gardens, according to Census 2000. Further, this borrower group received a small
portion of both prime and high-cost loans, as compared to their percentage of the city’s households (i.e. 62.4 percent of prime and 64.8 percent of high-cost loans). Asian borrowers,
on the other hand, comprised the smallest share of Miami Gardens’ households (1 percent) while receiving a higher portion of prime loans (1.4 percent) and a smaller portion of high-cost
loans (0.5 percent) than their share of households in the city. Low-and moderate-income (LMI) borrowers, or borrowers whose income is less than 80 percent of the MSA median income, received
a significantly lower portion of both prime and high-cost loans with respect to their portion of the city’s households. Though LMI borrowers accounted for over 41 percent of all households
in Miami Gardens, they received only 15.9 percent of prime and 12.7 percent of high-cost loans in 2006. On the other hand, middle-and upper-income (MUI) borrowers, or borrowers whose
income is greater than 80 percent of the MSA median income, received a significantly greater portion portion of both prime and high-cost loans with respect to their portion of Miami
Gardens’ households. MUI borrowers accounted for about 59 percent of all households while receiving 84.1 percent of all market-rate single-family loans and 89.7 percent of all high-cost
loans in 2006 (See Attachment 5-Table 2a and Chart 2a).
30 In the City of Miami Gardens, all of the owner-occupied units were located in predominantly minority census tracts, or tracts that are 50 to100 percent minority (See Attachment 8-Table
5a.). The disproportional distribution of market-rate and high-cost loans between LMI and MUI census tracts was similar to the trends observed for LMI and MUI borrowers. Of the owner-occupied
housing units in the city, 25 percent were located in LMI census tracts, or tracts with a median income that is less than 80 percent of the MSA median income. Lenders originated only
16.6 percent of their market-rate single-family loans and 21.6 percent of their high-cost loans to borrowers in LMI tracts. MUI census tracts, on the other hand, contained about 75 percent
of the city’s owner-occupied housing units, while their residents received 83.4 percent of the market-rate and 78.4 percent of the high-cost loans originated in Miami Gardens in 2006
(See Attachment 7-Table 4a.). Market Share Analysis of All Single Family Lending in Miami Gardens The share of high-cost loans out of all loans originated to Hispanics and African-Americans
was greater than for white non-Hispanic borrowers. African American borrowers were 1.14 times more likely than white non-Hispanic borrowers to receive a high-cost loan (this ratio is
calculated by dividing the percent of all loans to African Americans that were high-cost, 57.3 percent, by the percent of all loans to white non-Hispanic borrowers that were high-cost,
50.2 percent). Similarly, Hispanic borrowers were 1.34 times more likely to receive a high-cost loan than their white non-Hispanic counterparts (See Attachment 4-Table 1b and Chart 1b.).
Surprisingly, LMI borrowers were less likely to receive a high-cost loan than MUI borrowers (this is 47 percent divided by 59 percent). (See Attachment 5-Table 2b and Chart 2b) Borrowers
in LMI tracts were 1.14 times more likely to receive high-cost loans than borrowers in MUI tracts (calculated by dividing 62.98 percent by 55.11 percent). (See Attachment 7-Table Table
4b) Finally, Attachment 8-Table 5b shows that during 2006, the proportion of all loans originated to borrowers in minority neighborhoods that were high-cost (56.4 percent) was larger
than the proportion of all loans originated to the same borrower group that were prime (43.4 percent). Denial Disparity Analysis As indicated in Table 1c and Chart 1c, African-American
borrowers in Miami Gardens were denied ASF loans 27.9 percent of the time, while white non-Hispanic borrowers were rejected 25.8 percent of the time. In other words, African-Americans
were denied loans 1.08 times more often than white non-Hispanic borrowers (calculated by dividing
31 27.9 percent by 25.8 percent). Further, Hispanic borrowers were almost as likely to be denied ASF loans as were white non-Hispanic borrowers (i.e. Hispanics were denied loans 1.01
times more often than whites). LMI applicants were more likely to be denied a single-family loan compared to MUI borrowers. LMI borrowers were denied loans 1.25 times as often as more
affluent borrowers (Attachment 5-Table 2c and Chart 2c). Consistent with the above trends, residents of LMI tracts were about 1.2 times as likely to be denied a single family loan, as
compared to MUI tract residents (See Attachment 7-Table 4c.). Finally, Attachment 6-Table 3 displays an analysis of lending by gender. Generally speaking, there were no great disparities
in home lending when gender was considered. Fair Housing Implication: Disparities in lending practices indicate a need for industry training in Fair Housing and Fair Lending laws and
consumer education regarding lending processes and avoiding abusive practices. D. Housing, Neighborhood Revitalization, Transportation--Needs and Obstacles (City of Miami Gardens Consolidated
Plan 2006-2011 and Comprehensive Development Master Plan-Housing Element) Miami Gardens is an urban community that is 93% built out with a forecasted 8% increase in population growth
by 2010. The City experienced a tremendous increase in housing prices and rental rates between 2000 and 2006, reducing the availability of affordable housing for the community-at-large
and for its low to moderate income residents particularly. The recent cycle of natural disasters throughout the country has created a critical shortage of both labor and materials, driving
up the cost of construction. These factors, coupled with the development pressure from private industry, have and will continue to make affordable housing a difficult issue to address
with limited funding. In light of these facts, the City will need to be innovative and leverage partnerships to maximize its ability to implement various housing programs. As a new municipality,
the City of Miami Gardens is working to secure additional funding streams to enhance its CDBG programs, ie., HOME program funds. The City of Miami Gardens Department of Community Development
utilizes the grant funds it receives from the federal and state government sources to aid in the development of a viable urban community. The primary objective of this department is
32 to provide decent housing, a suitable living environment and the expansion of economic opportunities for the neediest. The Department serves the City’s very low, low and moderate
income residents by carrying out a wide range of community development housing activities such as Homeownership Assistance, Housing Rehabilitation and Emergency Housing Rehabilitation.
The Housing Rehabilitation Program utilizes Federal and State funds. The following Statutes and Regulations govern the program and are the source of the policies in this document. CDBG
Program (Community Development Block Grant: Federal Statute: Title 1-The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. 42 U.S.C.-5301 Regulations: 24 CFR 570 SHIP Program (State Housing
Initiative Partnership): Florida Statute: Chapter 420.907 Regulations: Florida Housing Finance Corporation Rule Chapter 67-37 Housing Rehabilitation Program The program provides forgivable
loans to low income homeowners in the City of Miami Gardens on a first-come, first-served, first-ready basis to make necessary repairs to their properties. Emergency Rehabilitation Program
The Department will provide a forgivable loan for the intent to remedy an Emergency Condition that are of eminent danger to the household members. The terms will be the same as those
for the Rehabilitation Program. Disaster Recovery Program The Department will provide a forgivable loan to remedy any damages caused by the 2005 Hurricanes or to harden the home for
impact from future hurricanes. Replacement Home Program The Replacement Homes Program is designed to address substandard and dilapidated housing units where the repairs needed cannot
be addressed through the Housing Rehabilitation Program due to cost versus existing home value. This program involves the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a new
3 bedroom 2 bath house on the same lot. Homeownership Assistance Program The Homeownership Assistance will provide a modest level of subsidy that could be leveraged against other programs
within the County to increase homeownership
33 opportunities to assist low-to-moderate income first time homebuyers. The City of Miami Gardens underwrites the loan based on the first mortgage lender’s commitment. Partnerships
Approved Lending Partners The Department of Community Development partners with several local lenders. Homebuyer Counseling Agencies The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
has approved several agencies located in the City of Miami Gardens to provide various types of counseling services to City Residents. These services include but are not limited to Homebuyer
Education Courses, Money Debt Management, Post Purchase Counseling and Predatory Lending. Transportation (City of Miami Gardens Comprehensive Development Master Plan-Transportation Element)
Miami Gardens is centrally located in the region. The boundaries are from I-95 and NE 2nd Avenue on the East; NW 47th Avenue and NW 57th Avenue on the west; County Line Road on the north;
and NW 151st Street on the South. This location at the boarder of Miami-Dade and Broward Counties, makes Miami Gardens extremely accessible, and a viable residential and business destination.
The city is easily accessed by I-95, the Palmetto Expressway (SR 826), the Florida Turnpike, as well as numerous other county and state surface roads that form a relatively uninterrupted
grid through the City. There are many levels of connectivity in Miami Gardens, from major interstates, regional rail transit, and sub regional county and state roads, to prevalent pedestrian
and bicycle facilities. The CSX tracks, located along the southeast boundary of the City, are the only rail facility located within the City of Miami Gardens. The tracks carry the TriRail
trains through the Golden Glades Interchange between the Miami International Airport and west Palm Beach County. There are no airports or seaports within the City of Miami Gardens. However,
the Opa-Locka Airport is located immediately adjacent to the City limits. There are no airports or seaports within the City of Miami Gardens. However the Opa-Locka Airport is located
immediately adjacent to the City limits. Miami Dade County Transit Routes, twenty bus routes are sponsored by Miami Dade Transit plus two by Broward County Transit (not shown on map)
for a total of twenty-two (22) existing routes. In Miami Dade County, employment centers are connected to residential areas primarily by the roadway network. There are limited transit
options. Most people live miles from where they work, and must take one of few connecting routes to get there. Additionally
34 there is a feeling that the bus transit does not adequately service the local community. There is a call for a community circulator. Many communities in Miami Dade County have their
own circulator systems. Several such systems in North Miami Dade County are linking their systems at key locations. These include North Miami Beach, Aventura, Bal Harbor, North Miami
and Surfside. A review of the bus routing reveals that most of the routes also move through the community connecting with other destinations. Most of the major roadways have bus routes
on them. The routing is regional in nature. This may require several transfers for a rider to reach an in-city destination. A circulator may help in this respect. Overall Miami Gardens
is highly accessible with the automobile bus and rail transit. E. Public and Assisted Housing Public Housing (City of Miami Gardens Consolidated Plan 2006-2011) The Miami-Dade Housing
Agency (MDHA) is the primary agency that provides public housing services within the City of Miami Gardens. The MDHA functions under the direction of the Miami-Dade County Board of County
Commissioners, and is staffed by County employees. This agency provides services countywide and within the City of Miami Gardens in particular. The MDHA functions as a unit of County
government. The City of Miami Gardens does not have the power to appoint members to the “board”, hire staff, procure services, or direct capital projects. The Miami Dade Housing Agency
(MDHA) Provides a variety of affordable housing through programs supported through the administrations of the HUD Public Housing program in Miami Dade County. The Public Housing Division
of the Miami Dade Housing Agency has as its primary administrative function the Public Housing program. MDHA is the ninth largest public housing agency in the nation. It provides federal
subsidies for 186 units in the City of Miami Gardens and over 10,000 units countywide
of public and other assisted housing. MDHA manages and maintains 18,000 vouchers and other subsidies for private housing for low-and moderate-income residents of the County; it offers
limited supportive services and programs to improve the quality of life and general environment of public housing residents; and coordinates most of the County’s affordable housing programs,
including the infill housing initiative. It is the purpose of the Miami Dade Housing Agency to manage, maintain and improve over 10,000 units of County-owned, federally subsidized and
mixed use housing; facilitate provision of supportive services and programs to improve the quality of life and general environment of public housing residents; coordinate contracting
for over 17,000 units of privately-owned low-and moderate-income housing, ensuring safe, decent
35 housing; provide mortgages to low-to moderate-income working families for homeownership and loans to developers for building affordable housing; develop in-infill properties for low-to
moderate-income families homeownership. The types of public/assisted housing structures range from single family homes scattered throughout several residential communities, duplexes,
town homes, multi family structures, and mid and high rise structures that are supported by complex building support systems, including but not limited to emergency generators, elevators,
heating systems for water and air, domestic water pumps, life safety and other emergency support devices. There are several renter-occupied housing developments within the City using
federal, state or local subsidy programs. Currently, the City has six public housing rental properties, containing a total of 186 units, operated by MDHA. A majority of the MDHA units
in the City of Miami Gardens are dedicated to families, as indicated in the table below. MDHA Housing Units in the City of Miami Gardens Name Address Units Type Vista Verde FHA Scattered
Homes 30 Family Miami Gardens Apts. NW 183 St. /22 Avenue 45 Family Opa-Locka Family C 1802-2113 NW 151 St. 9 Family Palmetto Gardens 16850 NW 55 Avenue 40 Elderly FHA Homes Miami-Dade
County Scattered Homes 10 Family Venetian Gardens 16100 NW 37 Avenue 52 Family Total Units 186 Source: Miami Dade Housing Agency – Public Housing Division According to MDHA, the physical
condition of the units at the present time is good. The units are inspected, ranked and scored annually by the contract inspectors for US HUD and by the Real Estate Assessment Center.
The scores represent the conditions found at the property regarding exterior building, site conditions, common areas, and health and safety findings of the inspection team. Maintenance
and repairs needed are completed to meet Housing Quality Standards established by US HUD. There are other local and federal regulatory standards that have to be met for the annual recertification
of the units and continued occupancy by residents within the housing program. Certified staff provides property management, inspections, maintenance, and emergency response (i.e. hurricane
preparation and recovery efforts) to the properties. Contract services are also utilized to provide support and maintenance of major equipment, including elevator & generator service,
lawn maintenance, domestic garbage collection, and contract renovations.
36 The MDHA has three renovation projects that affect public housing development in the City of Miami Gardens. These renovations are scheduled for Vista Verde, the Opa-Locka Family development
and the Miami Gardens Apartments. MDHA has obtained approval from US HUD to sell 21 units of the Vista Verde public housing development. Funding for the repair of the units in the Vista
Verde sub-division includes the renovation of two homeownership units. In addition, the agency recently received approval for the disposition sale of the twenty-six units in the FL 5-074
Opa-Locka Family development. The units will be offered for sale as authorized by US HUD, first being offered to the existing/current residents with qualification requirements and assistance
through credit counseling and finance assistance. Nine of the homes in the development fall inside the City limits along the north side of 151st Street, adjacent to the area known as
the triangle. The final project is located within the Miami Gardens Apartments, which is a 45-unit town home development. According to the data obtained from the Miami Dade Housing Agency,
the City of Miami Gardens has 4,081 applicants on the waiting list for Public Housing and 4,370 applicants on the waiting list for Section 8 vouchers. The table below illustrates the
characteristics of the applicants current on the waiting list residing within the zip codes that include the City of Miami Gardens (some zip codes cross into surrounding jurisdictions).
Miami Dade Housing Agency Wait List City of Miami Gardens Applicants Demographic Public Housing Section 8 White 10% 420 11% 488 Black 88% 3,590 87% 3,808 Native American 0.34% 14 0.32%
14 Asian 0.12% 5 0.14% 6 Other 1% 52 1% 54 Disabled 5% 214 7% 293 Age 0-25 22% 892 21% 936 Age 26 -50 43% 1,745 42% 1,831 Age 51-75 7% 307 10% 422 Age 76+ 1% 38 1% 63 Waiting List Totals
4,081 4,370 Source: Miami Dade Housing Agency, 05/06 Persons with Disabilities-Section 504 MDHA is currently under a voluntary compliance agreement with the Department of Justice and
US HUD for compliance with Section 504 of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (U.F.A.S.). This effort will bring into compliance all properties
37 within the Public Housing portfolio as determined by survey and economic feasibility that will be certified to meet the standards and tolerances established by the Standard. The MDHA
has adopted a strategy in its Annual Plan for FY 2006-2007 to address Section 504 Needs. The strategy is to target available assistance to families with disabilities. To do this, the
MDHA will carry out modifications needed in public housing based on Section 504 need assessment; apply for special purpose vouchers targeted to families with disabilities; and affirmatively
market local non-profit agencies that assist families with disabilities. Homeownership The MDHA encourages public housing residents to become more involved in the management of the development
and to participate in homeownership through its Family Self-Sufficiency Program. The program has 483 participants, which includes both Pubic Housing and Section 8 Voucher program recipients.
As of September 2005, there were approximately 53 public housing and 150 Section 8 program participants with escrow balances. MDHA has also implemented a Section 8 homeownership program
to provide Section 8 participants the opportunity to purchase a home. The housing agency also offers a variety of homeownership programs to low and moderate-income families through its
Development and Loan Administration Division, and New Markets Division. Programs include Surtax, State Housing Initiative, HOME, and infill programs. F. Homelessness (City of Miami Gardens
Consolidated Plan) The Miami-Dade County Community Homeless Plan called for the creation of a coordinating body, the Miami-Dade Homeless Trust, to ensure the implementation of the Plan,
administer the proceeds of the food and beverage tax and other resources identified by the Trust for the continuum, and serve in an advisory capacity to the Board of County Commissioners
on all issues relating to homelessness. Created in 1993, the Trust built upon the broad-based representation of the local task force responsible for developing the plan and has a 27-member
board that is composed of representatives of key stakeholders in the planning and delivery of homeless housing and services in the County. As required by HUD, each jurisdiction must
develop a local continuum of care plan. The City of Miami Gardens, in partnership with the Trust, operates under the Miami-Dade County Community Homeless Plan. The Trust serves as the
lead agency implementing a countywide strategy to serve homeless individuals and families throughout the community. The Trust pools the Entitlement Jurisdiction funds for all of Miami-Dade
38 County to fund a wide variety of Homeless Assistance programs. The City of Miami Gardens along with the cities of Miami, Miami Beach, Hialeah, and North Miami has joined in partnership
with the Miami-Dade County Homeless trust to provide countywide Homeless Assistance Services. The Homeless Trust, in partnership with the City of Miami Gardens, bases their determination
of homeless needs on countywide homeless census reports done twice yearly. The last census was conducted in January 2006, and was the lowest point-intime census in the history of the
Homeless Trust with 5,160 homeless people in the County: 1,989 on the streets and 3,171 in Emergency and Transitional Housing. The countywide system of care serves approximately 10,000
homeless men, women, and children per year, with approximately 50% placed into permanent housing as a result of a system-wide strategy to end homelessness. Data in the Homeless Trust’s
Homeless Management Information System indicates that 27% of the homeless counted in January 2006 were homeless families and 9% has served in the U.S. military. The table below illustrates
additional characteristics of homeless individuals and families countywide. 2006 Characteristics of Homeless -Countywide Sex Male 59% Female 39% Unknown 2% Age Children -under age 18
28% Adults -18 to 60 65% Elderly -60 and older 4% Unknown 3% Race American Indian/Alaskan Native 0% Asian 0% Black/African American 59% White 32% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
0% Other; Multi-Racial 7% Unknown 2% Disabling Conditions Physical 1% Developmental Disability 0.1% Mental Health 26% As a part of its Annual Shelter Count Plan, the Homeless Trust has
been conducting two homeless counts per year since 1997. The point-in-time data collection date used to
39 complete Part 1 and 2 of the Homeless Population and Subpopulation Chart was January 27, 2006. A total of 127 people, consisting of 43 outreach workers, 66 volunteers, and 18 police
officers, participated in the count. The next counts are scheduled for summer 2006, January 2007 and so on. In addition to the bi-annual census, Homeless Management Informatin System
(HMIS). Sheltered Census data is emailed daily to the entire Miami Dade Continuum of Care. In January 2006, information regarding sub-populations was also collected from all Continuum
of Care (CoC) providers via a point-in-time survey that netted results for sub-population information representing over 2,000 homeless individuals and families. All providers received
training on the survey instrument and all surveys were submitted to the Homeless Trust. The response rate for the surveys was 25% of the countywide sheltered population. The percentages
of sub-populations, which were obtained based on outreach, emergency and transitional housing, and supportive services, were as follows: • 21% chronically homeless, • 29% seriously mentally
ill, • 25% chronic substance abuse, • 10 % veterans, • 5% persons with HIV/AIDS, • 5% domestic violence, and • 3% youth Thus, current sub-population data for emergency, transitional,
and unsheltered populations can be estimated based on this statistically significant sample of over 2,000 people. To determine the sheltered subpopulation numbers, the percentages noted
above applied to the latest sheltered homeless population count. The table below provides further data on the homeless sheltered and unsheltered populations. All information regarding
unsheltered sub-populations was also collected from Continuum of Care Outreach providers via a point-in-time survey, which was analyzed in the same method as our sheltered population.
To determine the current unsheltered subpopulation numbers, the previous year percentages of 27% chronically homeless, 23% seriously mentally ill, 35% chronic substance abuse, 23 % veterans,
10% persons with HIV/AIDS, 5% domestic violence, and 6% youth were used. These percentages were applied to the unsheltered homeless population at the time of the 2006 homeless census
which accounted for over 271 unsheltered homeless individuals and families.
40 Population and Subpopulation Continuum of Care Homeless Population and Subpopulations Chart Part 1: Homeless Population Sheltered Un-Emergency Transitional sheltered Total 1. Homeless
Individuals 777 854 1,810 3,441 2. Homeless Families with Children 144 237 45 426 2a. Persons in Homeless with Children Families 591 949 179 1,719 Total (lines 1 + 2a) 1,368 1,803 1,989
5,160 Part 2: Homeless Subpopulations Sheltered Unsheltered Total 1. Chronically Homeless 342 2,567 2,909 2. Severely Mentally Ill 583 0 583 3. Chronic Substance Abuse 503 0 503 4. Veterans
201 0 201 5. Persons with HIV/AIDS 80 0 80 6. Victims of Domestic Violence 291 0 291 7. Youth (Under 18 years of age) 60 0 60 TOTAL 2,060 2,567 4,627 Individuals and families who are
at risk of homelessness are served through a countywide Homeless Helpline, which provides case management, rental, mortgage and utility assistance to those at risk of homelessness. This
category includes people who are facing eviction, living doubled up, or are un/underemployed. The Miami Dade Homeless Trust does not provide estimates of at risk populations. Priorities
The City of Miami Gardens has mirrored the priorities of the Homeless Trust as our regional service provider. The table below outlines the relative priorities of various categories of
homeless needs within the Continuum of Care. Activities which are identified as “Medium” priorities are those which will likely receive Consolidated Plan funding if the applicable formula
grants to the City of Miami Gardens are increased during the next five years and. Activities that receive a “Low” priority will not receive Consolidated Plan funding over the next five
years without an amendment to this Consolidated Plan. A “Low” rating does not necessarily diminish the importance of these activities or indicate that there is no need for them in the
City. Many activities that are assigned a “Low” priority for CDBG funding are nevertheless important needs for the community or high priorities for other sources of funding. Some activities
receive “Low” ratings if the funds that are potentially available under the Consolidated Plan programs would be insufficient to have a meaningful impact on these needs or adequately
funding them would result in minimal output or outcome accomplishments relative to the amount of
41 funds expended at the expense of other priority programs. Homeless Needs Funding Housing Continuum of Care Individuals Families Funding source Emergency Shelter Low Low Other, County
Transitional Housing Low Low Other, County Permanent Supportive Housing Medium Medium Other, County Chronically Homeless Medium Medium Other, County Each year the Homeless Trust meets
with all of its entitlement partners to establish funding priorities for the upcoming year. The City of Miami Gardens, in partnership with the Miami Dade Homeless Trust, established
the priority homeless needs that are identified in this plan. Miami Dade County needs 831 beds to serve the chronically homeless. The County currently has 342 beds available, leaving
a gap of 489 beds to serve this population. The Trust, in partnership with the City of Miami Gardens, has given high priority to addressing the problems with the chronically homeless
population, and has adopted measurable goals to approach the problem. G. Planning and Zoning/Building Codes (Accessibility) A survey composed of suggested questions from HUD’s Fair Housing
Planning Guide was completed by the staff of the Planning & Zoning and Community Development Departments. The following summarizes the information obtained from the survey: Planning
and Zoning There are concentrations of low-and moderate-income housing in the City of Miami Garden’s geographical area. Current zoning and other policies and procedures have had a neutral
effect on the existence of such concentrations for the past five years. The City is currently evaluating whether there is a concentration of subsidized housing relative to neighboring
areas. The City considers the impact of its zoning ordinance(s), building codes, and other land use policies on the provision of lower-income housing to be similar to that of most other
jurisdictions in the region. Zoning regulations permit medium-and high-density for vacant land that can developed within the city’s geographical area and is not limited to only low-density
housing (and accompanying
42 high cost). The City is currently in the process of developing incentives to promote mixed-income housing development. The City’s requirement for minimum street frontage, front yard
setbacks, side yard dimensions or amenities, or for offsite improvements such as restrictions on the level of density that is possible for new housing development limit affordability
to higher-income households. Zoning requirements typically favor conventional single family homesite designs over cluster development. Conventional single family zoning has been in place
for 50-60 years for most of the city. Building Codes (Accessibility) Florida’s building code has incorporated the accessibility provisions of the most recent edition of the American
National Standards Institute A117.1 and Usable Building and Facilities and model building codes, applicable to all jurisdictions in the state. VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A.
Identified Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Having completed its examination of all available data, inclusive of surveys and testing results, personal interviews and meetings, HOPE,
Inc. concludes that there are five (5) impediments to fair housing choice evident in the City of Miami Gardens and proposes the implementation of the following work-plan to address and
correct the identified impediments: 1. Violations of federal, state, and local fair housing laws in the jurisdiction and immediate surrounding areas 2. Lack of awareness of fair housing
laws, issues and resources 3. Racial disparities in fair and equal lending 4. A strongly segregated housing market 5. Limited funding availability for the creation of affordable housing
opportunities
43 B. Fair Housing Plan GOAL #1 REDUCE INCIDENCE OF HOUSING DISCRIMINATION Fair Housing Activities Action/Agreement required Measurable Results Program/Staff Responsibility Time Period
for Completion Provide fair housing education and outreach workshops to housing providers to foster compliance with federal, state, and local fair housing laws Develop or update training
curriculum and coordinate efforts housing providers Number of completed workshops/trainings and number of individuals reached Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Support
private enforcement of fair housing laws Partner with local public and private fair housing agencies to coordinate most effective means of processing and referring complaints Number
of complaints referred and/or resolved Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Provide fair housing and affirmative marketing training to all recipients receiving City funds
for housing related and community based projects and monitor compliance, where appropriate Identify participants, develop training curriculum, and collect materials to be distributed
Increased access to housing opportunities funded by the City Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor GOAL #2: EDUCATE THE COMMUNITY ABOUT IT’S RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO
FAIR HOUSING Fair Housing Activities Action/Agreement required Measurable Results Program/Staff Responsibility Time Period for Completion Disseminate a fair housing media campaign Submit
PSA’s in local TV/Newspapers, tap local cable highlighting local, state and national fair housing news Increased awareness demonstrated by logged number of complaints by the general
public Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Appoint a committee interact with local media Select appropriate staff, community members and reps. from housing industry to
serve on committee Formation of committee and implementation of recommendations Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor
44 Implement a fair housing media campaign Provide public service announcements, and community forums on public radio and television (including the City television network) Increased
number of residents served Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Educate City Council members and City employees regarding responsibility to affirmatively further fair housing
Identify categories of government employees who should receive fair housing training Local jurisdiction awareness of fair housing laws to encourage identification and reporting or discrimination
Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Conduct an annual community-wide fair housing event Partner with other jurisdictions and community groups and coordinate event Heightened
awareness of fair housing rights and responsibilities Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor GOAL #3: REDUCE DISCRIMINATORY AND ABUSIVE PRACTICES IN LENDING Fair Housing Activities
Action/Agreement required Measurable Results Program/Staff Responsibility Time Period for Completion Reduce differences in the market penetration for various racial and ethnic areas
Examine disparities and create a plan to rectify the differences Decreased differences in market penetration amongst racial and ethnic minorities Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor
Implement a publicity campaign Provide public service announcements, and community forums to public radio and television (including the county and municipal television channels Increased
number of residents served Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor GOAL #4 PROMOTE INTEGRATION AND DIVERSITY WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS Fair Housing Activities Action/Agreement
required Measurable Results Program/Staff Responsibility Time Period for Completion Provide technical assistance training in affirmative marketing to recipients of administered funds
for development Identify and require recipients to participate in training; contract with local fair housing agency to provide training Training provided to Cityfunded recipients Community
Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor
45 Provide fair housing training for city government staff, community advocates, housing providers and financial institutions Identify and coordinator perspective participants and contract
with local fair housing center Educational workshops provided for various community groups Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Provide multi-language format presentations
to community members Identify locations to provide workshops and contract with local fair housing center Increased awareness on the part of residents. Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contracto
r GOAL #5: PROVIDE MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING Fair Housing Activities Action/Agreement required Measurable Results Program/Staff Responsibility Time Period for Completion Encourage housing
providers to participate in Section 8 program Identify local housing providers and arrange to meet and explain the benefits of participating in the Section 8 program. Increased number
of landlords that participate in the program Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Provide information and technical assistance on housing development programs Provide training
or contract for professional services Increase in affordable housing development Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Emphasize mixed income housing in all neighborhoods
Select neighborhoods being targeted for redevelopment Increase in racially, ethnic economically and diverse neighborhoods Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor Support pre-purchase
counseling programs Provide training or contract for professional services Increased diversity in City Community Development Or Sub-recipient/contractor VII. SIGNATURE PAGE Reviewed
and accepted this ____ day of ___________, 2_____.