HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-142-1324 - Eminend Domain Proceedings for 1401 NW 183 Street
1515 NW 167 Street, Building 5 Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169 City of Miami Gardens Agenda Cover Memo Council Meeting Date: September 8, 2010 Item Type: (Enter X in box) Resolution
Ordinance Other X Fiscal Impact: (Enter X in box) Yes No Ordinance Reading: (Enter X in box) 1st Reading 2nd Reading X Public Hearing: (Enter X in box) Yes No Yes No X Funding Source:
CIP Budget -Bond Proceeds Advertising Requirement: (Enter X in box) Yes No X Contract/P.O. Required: (Enter X in box) Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid #: X Sponsor Name City Manager Department: City
Manager’s Office Short Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO TAKE SUCH STEPS AS
SHALL BE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE TO INSTITUTE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO CHAPTERS 73 AND 74, FLORIDA STATUTES, REGARDING THE CONDEMNATION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS THE EAST 3/5 OF THE SOUTH ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 50 FEET, LYING AND BEING IN MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, HAVING A CIVIL STREET ADDRESS OF 1401 NW. 183RD ST., MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA, ("SUBJECT PROPERTY") IT BEING DETERMINED, AFTER IN INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION, THAT THE ACQUISITION
OF FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL SERVE THE PUBLIC PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ROLLING OAKS PARK AND THE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES OF THE CITY'S RESIDENTS
AND GUESTS; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR DETERMINATIONS OF PUBLIC PURPOSE AND NECESSITY; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF REPRESENTATIONS; PROVIDING FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO
THE CITY CLERK; ITEM K-3) RESOLUTION Eminent Domain Proceedings
1515 NW 167 Street, Building 5 Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169 Staff Summary: The City Council previously authorized the City Manager, City Attorney to negotiate with the property
owner of the property described in the attached Resolution, and if said negotiations were unsuccessful, to take all steps to condemn through eminent domain. Jim Brady of Arnstein & Lehr,
LLP was retained and the negotiations with the property owner ensued but were unsuccessful. As a result, a Petition for Condemnation was filed, and an Order of Taking hearing commenced.
After testimony given at the hearing and based upon inquiries made by the Court for the City’s actual need for the property and matters such as Levels of Service, etc., it is being recommended
by outside counsel that the City Council adopt another Resolution that makes certain specific legislative findings with respect to the need for the property, the Parks Master Planning
process, levels of service and additional information. As such, the attached Resolution is before the City Council for consideration. Proposed Action: That the City Council adopt the
attached Resolution Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES JULY 2006 Prepared By: The City of Miami Gardens Planning
and Zoning Department 1515 NW 167th Street, Building 5, Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-i TABLE OF CONTENTS GOAL 1: OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
NEEDS ..................................................................................1 OBJECTIVE 1.1: PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN .............................................................
.........................1 OBJECTIVE 1.2: COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES ................................................................2 OBJECTIVE 1.3: PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION.........................................................3 OBJECTIVE 1.4: ACCESS ............................................................................................
............................................3 OBJECTIVE 1.5: RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM.....................................................................................................4
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-1 CHAPTER V -RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES In 2003, upon its incorporation, the City of Miami Gardens inherited an essentially existing community with a relatively defined amount of open space and
recreation lands and facilities. Included in that system are sixteen parks and four pools that encompass approximately 170 acres. These City parks are supplemented by two small County
parks in the City. These parks form the backbone of the City’s park and recreation facilities. Several open space opportunities include areas such as canal rights-of-way. The Recreation
and Open Space Element is intended to provide direction for the development and redevelopment of the city’s parks as well as methods for insuring meaningful open space and parks for
new development and redevelopment. GOAL 1: OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION NEEDS Provide citizens of all ages residing in City of Miami Gardens a system of open space and recreation facilities
to meet their future active and passive recreation needs. Objective 1.1: Parks and Recreation Master Plan In recognition that the City is essentially developed and that the City has
inherited a collection of existing parklands and facilities, the City shall develop a parks and recreation master plan (master plan) to maximize the potential of existing resources and
explore the feasibility of creating new ones. Monitoring Measures: Adoption of a master plan that includes a plan for improvements to existing facilities and potentially proposes new
sites for recreational facilities. Policy 1.1.1: The master planning process shall include an inventory of all existing park and recreational facilities, as well as public open space
resources in the City. Policy 1.1.2: The master plan shall establish definitions for the following terms: • Open Space • Park Facility (tot-lot; neighborhood; community; regional) •
Recreational Facility Policy 1.1.3: The City shall adopt the following level of service standard the open space and recreation: 1.0 Acre of public park per 1,000 residents Policy 1.1.4:
As apart of developing the City’s land development regulations determine the minimum open space that should be dedicated by private developments to promote the City’s “garden” concept.
These dedications would be designed to ensure that new projects enhance existing amenities
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-2 and increase aesthetic values to create livable
communities within the City. Policy 1.1.5: As part of developing the parks planning process the City shall determine, based on the adopted levels of service and recommended guidelines,
the current and projected parks and recreational facilities deficiencies in the City. Policy 1.1.6: The master planning process shall provide master site planning for each existing park
and shall prioritize park improvements in terms of their development, infrastructure, and amenities. Policy 1.1.7: Due to the lack of availability of large open space parcels for future
parks, the master planning process should look into the idea of developing “pocket” parks on vacant lots throughout the City. Policy 1.1.8: As part of the master planning process, the
City shall consider conducting a survey to determine the public’s priorities and preferences when it comes to recreation. Policy 1.1.9: The parks and recreation master planning process
shall be inclusive of citizens with a public involvement component that includes advertisements, notices, public meetings and similar techniques to ensure community participation. Policy
1.1.10: The parks planning process shall consider potential grants and other outside funding sources available to develop and redevelop the City’s park facilities. Policy 1.1.11: City’s
parks planning shall include an evaluation mechanism to review standards, improvements, and available capacity on a regular basis. Policy 1.1.12: As part parks planning, the City shall
develop a feasibility study to identify a regional park facility of approximately100 acres. Objective 1.2: Coordination with Public and Private Agencies The City shall coordinate its
planning efforts with other public and private agencies in order to meet current and future demand for recreation. Monitoring Measures: Number of recreation and open space related grant
applications developed on an annual basis. Monitoring Measures: Number of parks and recreational facilities that are constructed and/or redeveloped.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-3 Policy 1.2.1: Continue to work with government
agencies and private sources for funding in the development of recreation facilities such as parks, greenways and bikeways, such as the proposed Snake Creek Bikeway. Policy 1.2.2: Continue
to work with Miami-Dade School Board to maximize the use of school site for public recreational activities in the future. Policy 1.2.3: Coordinate with civic and private groups to provide
recreation programs and events for residents within the public park sites. Policy 1.2.4: The City shall continue to require that open space be provided as a part of the development process
and that parks impact fees are collected. Objective 1.3: Parks and Recreation Implementation The City’s parks and recreation plans shall be implemented and monitored on an annual basis
as part of the City’s budget process. Monitoring Measures: Regular monitoring of parks and open space capacity and demand. Monitoring Measures: Successful implementation of improvements/renovation.
Policy 1.3.1: Pursuant to the City’s development review process, the City shall incorporate the dedication of open space, parks and recreational facilities into the City’s land development
regulations. Policy 1.3.2: Maintain and evaluate existing recreation facilities based on adopted/recommended standards, guidelines, impact fees and the available funding sources. Policy
1.3.3: Address and complete City park renovations, improvements and redevelopments per the master planning process. Policy 1.3.4: The master planning process shall identify deficiencies
in recreation facilities and evaluate the feasibility of acquiring new land or redeveloping existing facilities to overcome such deficiencies. Policy 1.3.5: Evaluate vacant property
that could be suitable for future or expanded park facilities. Policy 1.3.6: Pursue future strategic acquisition of lands through state/federally-funded grants and land acquisition programs.
Objective 1.4: Access The City shall ensure that adequate and appropriate access to all recreational facilities is made available to all citizens by automobile, transit, and bicycle/pedestrian
facilities.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-4 Monitoring Measures: The appropriateness of
access methods to existing and future park sites; the number of parking spaces (including handicap spaces) and bicycle racks at park sites; the accessibility to future pedestrian ways
and trails. Monitoring Measures: The degree of success with transportation and mobility related enhancements as they directly improve/benefit the access to parks and recreation facilities.
Policy 1.4.1: Maintain and, if necessary, obtain additional public access points for recreation and open space facilities. Policy 1.4.2: Ensure pedestrian and bicycle access to all park
facilities upon completion of renovations and new construction. Policy 1.4.3: Investigate the feasibility of developing the land along canals to provide public access, greenway trails
and linear parks for public passive recreation or conservation. Policy 1.4.4: Assure adequate access for handicapped and elderly residents to public and private parks and recreation
facilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Objective 1.5: Recreational Trail System Because the City has little vacant land available to convert to parks, it
is important to utilize those existing public properties to their fullest. To this end, the City should implement the recently adopted citywide Recreational Trails Master Plan (RTMP),
which utilizes canal rightsof-way and other blueways, existing parks, pedestrian walkways, sidewalks and bikeways, the Library Walking Trail and private lands to create an interconnected
system of trails. Monitoring Measures: Additional effective acreage added to the parks recreation and park system trough these linear trails. Monitoring Measures: The degree that the
component parts of the Recreational Trail System are joined by pedestrian facilities. Policy 1.5.1: All new and renovated parks should where possible, contain a pedestrian trail or walkway
accessible from public sidewalks or parking facilities. Policy 1.5.2: Develop and implement citywide trail/blueway/bike path projects along canals, other blueways, road rights-of-way,
and other rights-of-ways in coordination with existing parks and plans, other governmental agencies, private landowners, and the City Transportation Master Plan. Policy 1.5.3: Review
potential links between the various segments of the Recreational Trail System such as sidewalks and bike paths, identify missing links connecting these facilities and program their completion
through the Capital Improvement Program.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Page V-5 Policy 1.5.4: Review each component trail in
the City’s Recreational System for enhancements to more fully utilize these resources such as adding facilities or stations for fitness, family picnics, nature education, etc. Policy
1.5.5: All components of the City’s Recreational Trail System should be ADA compliant.
City of Miami Gardens’ 3 to 5 Year Land Acquisition Program March, 2009 Dr. Danny O. Crew, City Manager Purpose The City of Miami Gardens is the third largest city in Miami-Dade County.
In order to carry out its duties and responsibilities to the residents of the City, it is necessary to have a number of physical facilities from which city business can be conducted.
Because of the generally significant cost of such facilities, it is prudent to identify as many of these needs as possible and establish a program for their acquisition over time. History
Subsequent to the City of Miami Gardens being incorporated, Miami-Dade County transferred a number of real estate-based assets to the City. These included: Roadways, parks, and canals.
In addition to these assets, the City has purchased several facilities since incorporation. These include: -3+ acres for the expansion of Rolling Oaks Park -.25 acre for a small pocket
park at Jordan’s Landing -4+ acre site for a future City Hall building -The Old Mt. Herman Church at Bunche Park for possible expansion -The Police Headquarters Facility in the Sunshine
International Park -The Public Works Compound/Building in the Sunshine International Park -A 5 acre parcel across from Carolmart for potential economic development initiatives -A 15
acre parcel at NW 7th Avenue for economic development purposes Asset Needs A city needs to have a healthy infrastructure inventory in order to effectively carry out its responsibilities
to provide the best and most effective public services possible. These needs fall into several categories: Public Facilities such as parks and recreations centers; business facilities
such as the police headquarters, roads, and maintenance facilities; and economic development land/facilities for economic development purposes. Because land in the City of Miami Gardens
is essentially fully developed, it becomes especially important to identify our long-term property needs so that the City can take advantage of opportunities to pursue grants and other
financing financing in a timely manner and purchase needed assets when they may become available. Analysis 1
As indicated above, asset needs tend to fall into one (or more) of three categories: Public facilities, business facilities; and economic development facilities. This report will review
each in turn. 1. PUBLIC FACILITIES Public facilities are those facilities that have a direct connection to and where services are provided to the general public. These might include
Parks, recreations facilities, a City Hall, and roads. Roads: The City of Miami Gardens’ road system was inherited from Miami-Dade County. Being a fully developed, there is not expected
to be a need for additional roads. However, because of the general age of these roads, and the overcapacity of many of them, future projects involving the repaving and widening can be
expected. Since these projects will generally not involve land acquisition, they are not considered here. City Hall: A major investment in the future of any city is the building of its
first City Hall. Miami Gardens realized this early on and secured the preponderance of land for its its construction. City staff has identified one additional parcel that needs to be
purchased to complete the site. This is the Mint Lounge property. This should be added to the future property acquisition inventory. See MAP #1 below: MAP #1: Mint Lounge City Owned
Site City Hall Site #1 Parks: Upon incorporation, Miami-Dade County deeded some 16 parks to the City for our use. Most of these parks are neighborhood parks in the 2-5 acre size range.
Unfortunately, most of these parks are also heavily 2
overused due to the lack of adequate community park-sized facilities (10-40 acres). This has caused numerous problems with adjacent residents and property owners and in maintenance of
those facilities. To address this problem, in 2006, the City began an extensive parks renovation program, upgrading existing parks and fully developing the few larger parks we have to
handle more intensive recreational activities. In looking at our parks system as a whole, it is clear that for a city our size, Miami Gardens is woefully deficient in parks and open
space. One accepted national standard (National Recreation and Parks Association) recommends 10 acres of parks land for every 1,000 residents. Miami Gardens has less than 2 acres per
1,000 residents, and this is if you also count School Board playgrounds and sports fields in the number. Given the scarcity of available land in the city, it becomes critical for the
City to identify potential park additions and act quickly when they come on the market, if not sooner. MAP MAP #2 below is a map of the current city park facilities. In addition, staff
has identified various parcels throughout the City that have the potential for enhancing our parks program. The City should act quickly if and when these parcels become available to
purchase, even if immediate development is not feasible. Once such parcels are developed for housing or commercial purposes, they are lost forever to the City as parks sites. Map #2
below identifies several potential park sites that are recommended for possible acquisition. MAP #2: Potential City Park Additions Park Site #2 Park Sites #3 & 4 Park Park Site #5 Site
#1 3
Site #1 is approximately 190 acres at the NW corner of the City. While the entire site is not needed, approximately 100 acres would fulfill the City need for a regional parks and recreation
facility. See Map #3 below: Map #3: Park Site #1 Park Site #1 Site #2 is approximately 10 acres North of the Palmetto and immediately west of NW 22nd Avenue. This area is heavily wooded
and would help fill a gap in the City’s park system in that area. It is a prime location for a passive park with picnic and jogging facilities. See Map #4 below: MAP #4: Park Site #2
4 Park Site #2
Site #3 is a two (2) acre site located on 183rd Street immediately south of Rolling Oaks Park. This site is currently rented part-time as a church and is tied up in litigation. This
is a critical piece for the future of Rolling Oaks Park, especially the plan to move the Park’s main entrance from NW 17th Avenue to 183rd Street. See Map #5 below: MAP #5: Park Site
#3 Park Site #3 Rolling Oaks Park Site #4 (MAP #6 below) is a nearly 2-acre site that is currently occupied by a Child Day Care center. The site is immediately south of Rolling Oaks
Park and west of Site #3. Because large tracts of land are so hard to come by in Miami Gardens, the City needs to take advantage of our existing parks by enlarging them whenever possible.
This tract is well located to do this. As Rolling Oaks is the City’s largest park, it makes sense to consolidate outparcels whenever possible. The additional parking this site would
provide would be invaluable for the park’s usage. MAP #6: Rolling Oaks Site #4 5 Park Site #4
Park Site #5 (MAP #7 below) is a 14 acre site currently owned by the Archdiocese of Miami and is adjacent to the Turnpike along NW 183rd Street and NW 12th Avenue. This site has a number
of buildings along with 10 or more undeveloped acres. This site, including the main 22,000 square foot building could easily be converted into a dedicated Senior Center. The vacant land
could be used by Keep Miami Gardens Beautiful to develop a formal “Garden” to reflect our namesake. MAP #7: Archdiocese of Miami Park Site #5 While these are the major tracts that the
City should work toward acquiring, there may also be smaller opportunities that arise from time to time, especially where they adjoin existing parks and could provide expansion opportunities
to these existing facilities. 2. BUSINESS FACILITIES Business facilities are those facilities that have a direct connection to the inner workings of the City workforce. Some like the
police headquarters can be both a public and a business facility while others, like a maintenance facility, is only a business facility designed to serve the internal city organization.
The City of Miami Gardens has several such facilities: The police headquarters in the Sunshine International Park; the Public Works facility also in the Sunshine International park,
and the Parks Maintenance Facility located at Myrtle Grove Park. In looking at our current and long term needs, the City should be looking at several additional business facilities to
more efficiently and effectively carry out its business operations. 6
Vehicle Maintenance: One such facility that the City should be considering in the future is that of a vehicle maintenance facility. While it makes sense to outsource major vehicle repair
and equipment repair, with a fleet of over 500 vehicles and major pieces of equipment, it would be more cost effective to handle much of the routine maintenance at our own facility.
Tasks such as oil and fluid changes, preventive maintenance, tire changing, hose, belts and wiper replacement, etc., can all be done quicker and cheaper in-house. Another facility that
will need to be replaced in the future is that of the Police headquarters. The current facility, while adequate for the time being, was never designed to be used as a long-term answer
to the need. Currently, consideration is being given to co-locate the police department with the proposed City Hall on NW 27th Avenue. If this is done, it would open up the current police
facility to be used as a maintenance facility, solving the problem identified above. This makes sense as the City is currently planning to install a fuel station at this site. That facility
would be managed by the City’s maintenance function. Fueling Facility: In looking further at the future needs of City public facilities, an expansion of the proposed fueling facility
may be required to accommodate alternate fuel vehicles such as CNG/LPG, biofuels and electric. In order to accommodate this, it would probably be necessary to expand the current proposed
fueling facility through the purchase of an additional ½ acre to the east of the current site. This tract is unused and has little or no access, but would fit nicely into our proposed
fueling station. MAP #8: Future Business Facility real estate needs. Business Site #1 7
Currently, the City Police and Public Works have their offices at the 3 acre compound in NW 163 Drive in the Sunshine International Park as shown in Map #9 below: MAP #9: City Property
Addition Current Public Works Building and Walled Compound Current Police Building & Possible Future Maintenance Police Parking Lot & Future Fuel Depot Business Site #1 The site identified
as MAP #9 is a small ½ acre vacant parcel of property located immediately east of the police parking lot. This lot is only accessible through the City’s property from the west and from
the east, a non approved Railroad crossing on the spur line. As the City expands in the future, this parcel could prove to be useful for an expansion of the future fuel depot and for
site integrity. 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES In addition to large tracts of land for parks and city business enterprises, a municipality may want to obtain vacant infill lots,
or lots where City-developed housing or other public services such as parking could be provided provided might be appropriate. These can play a key role in the provision of workforce
housing within the community. For Miami Gardens, these objectives are carried out by the City’s Community Development Department and will not be the subject of this report. Another reason
for a municipality to purchase land not necessarily destined for a municipal use is to acquire land for economic development purposes. A major responsibility of local government is to
ensure that the City develops in such a fashion that new development is an asset and reflects the community’s needs and image. One way in which cities accomplish this is through its
planning and zoning regulations; however, these are not always sufficient to bring about the desired end. Another way for the city to ensure the type of development, especially in certain
8
9 ‘high visibility’ corridors, or in certain priority uses, is for the city to own the land. By having site control, the City can entertain proposals and effectively negotiate with only
those that reflect its desired development objectives. While the purchase of property for economic development is common among cities and counties throughout the nation, it should be
approached carefully. The City is not a speculator and should not purchase land without a valid economic development reason. The City’s recent purchase of the Warren Henry tract is a
good example. Here, the City entered into a transaction in which it could further the economic development efforts of the City while at the same time protect its investment through the
acquisition of the property at a substantial discount under the appraised market value. These types of opportunities should be considered in the future in those cases where the City
can assist in the development of a site while at the same time, ensuring that our investment is sound and that our return on investment is positive.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 2010 Prepared By: The City of Miami Gardens Planning and
Zoning Division of the Development Services Department 1515 NW 167th Street, Building 5, Suite 200 Miami Gardens, Florida 33169
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-i TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION
......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. INVENTORY
OF PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS AND FUNDING SOURCES ............................................................ 1 1. Public Health ..........................................................................
............................................................. 1 2. Schools ............................................................................................................................
..................... 2 3. Parks and Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 2 4. Water,
Sewer and Solid Waste Facilities and Services ...............................................................
2 5. Stormwater/Drainage ......................................................................................................................... 2 6. Transportation ................................
..................................................................................................... 3 C. EXISTING REVENUE SOURCES AND FUNDING MECHANISMS ............................................
.............................. 3 1. General Fund Revenues ..................................................................................................................... 4 a. Ad
Valorem Taxes-Real and Personal Property .................................................................................................... 4 b. State Revenue Sharing ..............................
................................................................................................................... 4 c. Utility Franchise Taxes ......................................................
.......................................................................................... 4 d. Utility Taxes .........................................................................................
.......................................................................... 5 e. Half-Cent Sales Taxes..................................................................................................
................................................ 5 f. Other Local Revenues ............................................................................................................................
...................... 5 2. Transportation Fund ........................................................................................................................... 6 3. Development
Services Fund ............................................................................................................. 6 4. Capital Projects Fund ................................................
......................................................................... 6 5. General Services Fund ..................................................................................................
..................... 6 6. Special Revenue Fund ........................................................................................................................ 6 7. Stormwater
Fund ................................................................................................................................ 6 D. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
....................................................................................... 7 1. Current Local Practices that Guide Capital Improvements ..................................................
...... 7 a. Level of Service (LOS) ................................................................................................................................................ 7
b. Schedule of Capital Improvements ............................................................................................................................ 7 c. Additional Capital
Improvements .............................................................................................................................. 8 d. Concurrency Management and Public Facility
Monitoring ................................................................................. 8
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-ii e. Plan Monitoring and Evaluation
and Appraisal ...................................................................................................... 9 2. Other Public Facility Timing and Location Practices .........................
........................................ 9 a. User Charges and Connection Fees ........................................................................................................................
. 10 b. Mandatory Dedications of Fees in Lieu of............................................................................................................. 10 c. Moratorium ........................
........................................................................................................................................... 10 3. General Fiscal Implications of Existing
Deficiencies and Future Needs .............................. 10 a. Transportation .....................................................................................................................
......................................... 10 b. Public Parks (Recreation and Open Space) ...........................................................................................................
11 c. Stormwater Drainage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 d. Potable
Water ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 e. Sanitary Sewer
............................................................................................................................................................. 12 f. Solid Waste .......................
............................................................................................................................................ 12 g. Other Capital Improvements .........................
........................................................................................................... 12 h. Cost Analysis of Capital Improvements and Basis of Cost Estimates ...................
......................................... 12 E. IMPACT OF PROPOSED PUBLIC SCHOOL OR MEDICAL SYSTEM FACILITIES ON PUBLIC FACILITIES ....................................................................
............................................................................................................. 13 F. TIMING AND LOCATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ......................................................................................................................................................................
13 G. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................................
15
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE CIE IX -1:
MIAMI-DADE HOSPITALS WITHIN 12 MILES OF THE CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS... 17 TABLE CIE IX -2: HEALTH CARE FACILITIES IN MIAMI GARDENS .....................................................................
17 TABLE CIE IX -3: PUBLIC SCHOOLS INVENTORY ......................................................................................................... 18 TABLE CIE IX -4: PUBLIC PARKS
INVENTORY ............................................................................................................... 19 TABLE CIE IX -5: CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS BUDGET SUMMARY, FY
05-06 .................................................. 20 TABLE CIE IX -6: PROJECTION OF AD VALOREM TAX REVENUES .....................................................................
21 TABLE CIE IX -7: PROJECTIONS OF NON-AD VALOREM TAX REVENUES ....................................................... 22 TABLE CIE IX -8: PROJECTIONS OF OPERATING COSTS .............................
.............................................................. 22 TABLE CIE IX -9: MIAMI GARDENS LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS ..............................................................
23 TABLE CIE IX -10: CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ...................... 27 TABLE CIE IX -11: CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS SCHEDULE OF ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS..............
..................................................................................................................................................... 45 TABLE CIE IX -12: CITY OF MIAMI
GARDENS 5-YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ... 49
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-1 CHAPTER IX – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ELEMENT DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS A. INTRODUCTION Miami Gardens’ Capital Improvements Element data, inventory and analysis provides a general overview and discussion of the City’s
financial situation and sets the overall economic framework that evaluates the combined fiscal impact of all improvements specified in the CDMP. Its purpose is three-fold: (1) Evaluate
the need for future capital improvements for each type of public facility identified in the CDMP to maintain the adopted level-of-service (LOS) pursuant to Growth Management requirements;
(2) Identify the funding for such improvements; and (3) Schedule the funding and construction of improvements. The CIE also has a key relationship to the Future Land Use Element through
concurrency, which stipulates that facilities and services must be available at their adopted service standard concurrent with the impacts of development. Therefore, decisions concerning
the planning of capital improvements and land use are directly correlated with each other. In that regard, the City of Miami Gardens will replace the existing Miami Dade County Plan.
One question regards the difference between the two plans upon facilities and services including but limit to transportation, water, sewer, and solid waste. Given that there are differences
between the proposed City and the existing County plans, will the City’s plan generate more or less development potential? To answer that question, a comparison analysis of development
potential for uncommitted vacant land is provided in the Future Land Use Element’s Data and Analysis section. Calculations of uncommitted vacant land development potential for both the
proposed City and the existing County plans illustrate that there is negligible difference between the two plans: 70 dwelling units. Therefore, the City of Miami Gardens’ new Comprehensive
Development Master Plan neither increases nor decreases the impact of development upon capital facilities and urban services in an appreciable manner. B. INVENTORY OF PUBLIC FACILITY
NEEDS AND FUNDING SOURCES Miami Gardens is a fast growing city that currently meets the needs of its residents by providing services such as public health, public schools, parks and
recreation, utilities, police, fire, and transportation. Although, these services with the exception of park and recreation are owned and/or operated by either the State or the County,
the City plays a major role in making this infrastructure (public facilities) available to its residents. To further explore a more detailed analysis of the public and educational facilities
see the Public Schools Element. 1. Public Health The City of Miami Gardens currently does not have any major health care facilities located within the City. The closest hospital is Parkway
Regional Medical Center located at 160 NW 170 Street, North Miami Beach, which is approximately 2 miles east of the City. Table CIE-1 details the five (5) hospitals located within a
12-mile radius outside of the City. There are also two minor health care facilities in Miami Gardens that are
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-2 available to the public. These facilities
along with addresses are indicated in Table CIE IX-2. 2. Schools The City of Miami Gardens currently has a total of twenty-seven (27) public schools and one (1) charter school within
the City limits: Eighteen (18) elementary schools, five (5) middle schools, two (2) senior high schools and two (2) alternative schools. There are also four schools (2 elementary, 1
middle and 1 high school) outside the City limits serving a significant number of students from the City of Miami Gardens. Table CIE IX-3 lists the name, address and grades of each school.
A detailed inventory and analysis of the public education facilities is referred in the Public School Facilities Element. The Miami-Dade County Public School Board has plans to fully
replace Miami Carol City Senior (Year 2007-2008) and Norland Senior (Year 2008-2009). 3. Parks and Recreation The City of Miami Gardens currently has a total of nineteen (19) locations
within the City limits offering recreational opportunities to its residents. Of the 19 locations, sixteen (16) are City parks, three of which include pools; one (1) is a stand-alone
pool facility; and two (2) are County facilities. There is also a walking trail – The Library Walking Trail, located just south of the Dolphins Stadium. Table CIE IX-4 contains a listing
of name, address and acreage of each park. A detailed inventory and analysis of the parks’ location and amenities can be found in the Recreation and Open Space Element. The proposed
city-wide Parks and Recreation Master Plan will address each park facility and its specific needs to maximize the potential of existing resources and explore the feasibility of creating
new ones. 4. Water, Sewer and Solid Waste Facilities and Services The City of Miami Gardens relies on Miami-Dade County WASD and the cities of North Miami Beach and Opa-Locka to provide
water, sanitary sewer and solid waste services to the City residents. As noted in the Infrastructure Element, the infrastructure providers have adequate capacity to meet the needs of
the future City residents. The City continuously coordinates with the County and DERM to ensure adequate service to its residents and does not have any plans for system improvements
that would require funding or scheduling. Each development must pay impact fees to the appropriate entity in order to insure that the impact upon facility capacity is met for each increment
of development. 5. Stormwater/Drainage At the date of this writing, the City was preparing a Stormwater Master Plan funded in part by the South Florida Water Management District. That
plan will identify and priorities deficiencies such as flooding problem areas within the City. A detailed inventory of the existing stormwater system, conducted as part of the master
plan process, shows a general deficiency of the following nature:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-3 • Lack of stormwater facilities
• Hydraulically inadequate stormwater facilities • Low lying structures • Inadequate maintenance of stormwater system At the date of this writing, the City was negotiating takeover of
the stormwater utility from Miami Dade County. This was accomplished in March 2007. Once that is accomplished, the City anticipates upwards of 6. Transportation As an already-developed
community, the City of Miami Gardens has had an established grid street system for well over fifty years. As reflected in the Transportation Element, the overall street system functions
well at the present time but it includes several street segments that are operating below acceptable peak hour level of service standards. Most of the LOS E and F conditions are on roadway
segments entering/exiting the city. By 2015 the overall LOS begins to deteriorate. Very few segments will operate better than LOS C. By 2030 even fewer segments will operate at LOS C
or better. The analysis shows that, for the most part, existing internal circulation is moving at acceptable levels of service and that mobility is beginning to breakdown at some of
the entries/exits of the community. The Transportation Element further states that mitigation of the future lack of mobility can take place through a focus of increasing physical capacity
where feasible, increasing transit capacity, utilization of transportation management policies as well as through the use of effective growth management tools and incentives through
land use policies, and concurrency management tools of infill development, redevelopment, and more dense mixed use development. The element further identifies three main broad areas:
Physical Capacity, Alternative Mode, and Transportation Management. There are no proposed road widenings or other major capacity improvements. The road system is basically complete and
has been for a number of years. However, there are a number of intersection improvements suggested that are intended to help provide better flow and safety. Alternative mode improvements
are suggested by way of transit and related improvements, many of which are identified as being by Miami Dade Transit. Regarding transportation management, along with a number of alternatives
suggested, the City has developed a transportation concurrency management area system which is reflected in the level of service standards contained in this plan. C. EXISTING REVENUE
SOURCES AND FUNDING MECHANISMS The City of Miami Gardens utilizes an expanded and stable revenue system to implement the financing of operations and administrating capital improvements
required to efficiently maintain the City’s functionality. This section describes the revenue sources and funding mechanisms currently used by the City. The City of Miami Gardens’ budget
for the fiscal year 2006 2010 currently consists of seven funds: Consolidated Fund,
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-4 General Fund, Transportation Fund,
Development Services Fund, Capital Projects Fund, General Services Fund, Special Revenue Fund, Community Development Block Grant Fund (CDBG), State Housing Incentive Partnership Fund
(SHIP) and Stormwater Fund. See Table CIE IX–5, City of Miami Gardens Budget Summary FY 05-06 , for a detailed analysis of operating revenues and expenditures. Also see Table CIE IX-6:
Projections of Ad Valorem Tax Revenues, Table CIE IX -7: Projections of Non-Ad Valorem Tax Revenues, and Table CIE IX -8: Projections of Operating Costs for related data. 1. General
Fund Revenues The General Fund is used to account for revenues that are not allocated to specific purposes and serve as the general operating fund of the City. General Fund revenue sources
include ad valorem-property taxes, state revenue sharing, utility franchise taxes, utility taxes, half-cent sales tax, and other local revenues. a. Ad Valorem Taxes-Real and Personal
Property Ad valorem or property taxes are taxes levied against the assessed value of real and certain personal property. The municipality sets a tax rate based on its needs and levies
this dollar cost per $1,000 of taxable valuation. Property tax revenues for Miami Gardens for FY-06 10 increased decreased approximately 14% 4% from FY-05 09 due to property values increasing
decreasing from $2,589,285,977 $4,695,454,000 with a millage rate of 3.6484 5.1402 to the current total of $3,003,121,386 $4,503,604,000 with a millage rate of 3.6384 5.3734. Using a
millage rate of 5.3734, this tax base value is expected to generate $12,038,242 $24,199,666 in property taxes; however, the City is only allowed to budget for 95% of this number. Therefore,
the approximation of $11,417,660 $22,989,682 will be allocated to the General Fund. b. State Revenue Sharing State Revenue Sharing was created by the State of Florida to ensure revenue
parity among local governments statewide. It is comprised of various Statecollected revenues including a portion of the State’s sales and gas taxes. In FY-06, the City expects to receive
approximately $3,830,406 in state shared revenues, 71.78% ($2,749,465) is going to General Fund Revenue and 28.22% ($1,080,941) will go to the Transportation Fund. The State Department
of Revenue estimates that State Revenue Sharing, because of the continuing poor statewide economy, will remain the same as budgeted for FY-09, which was cut twice by the state during
the year. The General Fund expects to receive $2,418,000 for FY10. This represents 71.02% of the total received. State law requires the balance (28.98%) go to the Transportation Fund.
c. Utility Franchise Taxes Fees Franchise taxes fees are locally levied to compensate the municipality for allowing private utility businesses within the City to use the City’s rights-of-way
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-5 to conduct their business. The agreement
between those utility providers and the City for this type of payment is spelled out in the City’s Charter. These taxes fees are paid to the City on an annual base. The City collected
$3,397,604 $5,588,428 in FY-095 and is budgeted to collect $4,266,231 $5,809,802 in FY-106 in utility franchise taxes fees. The Utility Franchise Tax Fee is economy-based revenue; therefore,
as an area grows, so does the revenue. The City has franchise agreements with: • Florida Power and Light (FP&L) • Bell-South • Stericycle • Mac-Pac Waste & Recycling, Inc. • BioMed Waste
Steritronix • Ransom Hauling • Lopefra Corporation • Gulf Equipment Corp • Waste Service USA, Inc. • World Waste Services, Inc. • C & C Waste Removal, Inc. • Waste Management of Dade
County • All Services Miami-Dade Division • BFI Waste Systems • Kaufs Towing Company d. Utility Taxes Utility taxes are paid by the customers who consume those serves such as water,
sewer, electric and communications as a percentage of their bill for using those various services. The City does not collect these taxes directly. The taxes are collected by Miami Dade
County and the State of Florida and remitted to the City in monthly increments. The estimated amount for FY-06 10 for all utility taxes received by the city is $8,195,264 $11,076,242.
e. Half-Cent Sales Taxes The Half-Cent Sale tax is a percentage of the retail sales on all goods and most services in the private sector. Miami Dade County’s tax rate is 6½%, therefore
holding the same for the City of Miami Gardens. This tax is collected by the State of Florida and then distributed to local governments based largely on population. Miami Gardens expects
to receive $6,579,548 in 2006 $6,610,000 in FY 10. f. Other Local Revenues
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-6 This revenue source is derived from
fees charged by the City for local services, including occupational licenses, alarm and landlord permits, certificates of use, parks and recreation fees, other operational revenues and
fines and forfeitures. Some of these revenues are collected by the County, while others are collected by the City. 2. Transportation Fund The Transportation Fund is made up of three
main sources of revenues. The first two are local gas taxes that are distributed at the County level and then shared with the municipalities. The first two taxes are the Local Option
Gas Tax, which is a 3-cent per gallon levy and the City is expected to receive bring the City $619,584 $1,675,000 in revenue for 2006 FY 10. New Local Option Gas Tax which is a 3 cent
per gallon levy is expected to bring in an estimated amount of $1,581,834 $660,000 to the City in 2006 2006 FY 10. As mentioned previously in the State Share Revenue section, the Transportation
fund also has revenue from the State. 3. Development Services Fund The City Development Services Fund was created to account for those activities that are principally designed to serve
the City’s development community, specifically, planning, zoning and building divisions. 4. Capital Projects Fund The Capital Project Fund is typically used for capital projects. The
revenues generated in this fund primarily come from grants; however, some funding also comes from the General Fund. For example, there is a percentage of ad valorem taxes that are set
aside for this fund. 5. General Services Fund The revenues that make up the General Services Fund have several sources, the primary one being the bank loan that was taken out to finance
capital projects for City operations. This is an internal service fund. 6. Special Revenue Fund The majority of the Special Revenue Fund is from impact fees paid by developers. The revenues
in this fund have to be dispersed for those specific improvements in which they were collected for. These fees are collected by the County (transportation, water, sewer, and fire) as
well as the City (parks and police). 7. Stormwater Fund The majority of the Stormwater Utility comes from a Stormwater Utility fee imposed by Miami-Dade County on utility bills. The
annual amount for this tax is $4 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Miami Gardens has approximately 70,000 ERU and is expected to receive fee revenues in the amount of $3,360,000
once the City takes control of Stormwater Utility from Miami-Dade County.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-7 D. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS
REQUIREMENTS This section is designed to present an analysis of the fiscal implications of the identified capital improvement needs within the City of Miami Gardens. Included in this
section are also descriptions of those current local practices that guide the timing and location of construction and/or extension of public facilities and services needed to stay concurrent
with the growth within the City. 1. Current Local Practices that Guide Capital Improvements a. Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service (LOS) is a performance measurement used to evaluate
the extent to which a public facility or service satisfies the demands placed on that system. LOS indicates the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. The State of Florida
typically monitors level of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater drainage, solid waste, recreation and open space, transportation, and public schools as addressed in
local government comprehensive plans. These standards become the criteria used to evaluate the adequacy of new development applications and determine the appropriateness of issuing development
orders or permits to ensure that adequate facility capacity will be maintained and available for future development. LOS standards affect the timing and location of development by encouraging
development in areas where facilities have excess capacity, and not permitting development unless needed facilities and services are provided. Such provision and development may occur
in a phased sequence over time. See Table CIE IX-9, for a detailed listing of Miami Gardens’ LOS standards. b. Schedule of Capital Improvements A schedule of capital improvements program
(CIP) is a schedule for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years (typically 5 years) to meet anticipated capital needs. The five-year CIP is updated
annually by the City Council. A Capital Improvement amendment schedule is used as an implementing mechanism. Table CIE IX-10, City of Miami Gardens Schedule of Capital Improvements provides
a detailed listing of the City’s projects, cost and schedule. The Schedule must reflect the goals, objectives and policies of the CDMP and be consistent with the implementation strategies.
The Schedule must also be consistent with the Capital Improvements Element of the City’s CDMP, and address the list of projects required to maintain and improve the adopted LOS standards
in accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. As noted already, the City of Miami Gardens does not have any capital improvement projects that are critical to maintaining or otherwise
improving level of service standards. All such facilities and services are provide by others including but not limited to major transportation facilities and services, potable water,
sanitary sewer, and solid
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-8 waste. The City will eventually
take over stormwater responsibilities from Miami Dade County. There are not level of service issues regarding services and facilities related to recreation and open space. c. Additional
Capital Improvements As a new city, the City of Miami Gardens is in the process of applying for a myriad of grants and other outside funding sources. Many agencies and organizations
require
that the projects, facilities and services being requested be included in the local government’s comprehensive plan. As such, the City has compiled an additional list of capital projects
that are included in Table CIE IX-11, Schedule of Additional Capital Improvements. d. Concurrency Management and Public Facility Monitoring Concurrency Management is established to ensure
that adequate capacity of public facilities is available based on LOS standards adopted in the CDMP. It also ensures that the proper timing, location and design of supportive facilities
and services are concurrent with the impacts of new developments. Concurrency in the City is applied during the development review process. Approval is contingent on demonstrated compliance
with the County’s concurrency ordinance which the City adopted along with other county ordinances. Concurrent to developing and adopting its own land development regulations, the City
of Miami Gardens will adopt a Concurrency Management System (CMS), pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, F.S. and Chapter 380, F.S., that insures the availability and sufficiency
of public facilities and services at the time that the impacts of development occur and provides a program to prevent a reduction in the levels of service (LOS) below the adopted LOS
standards. Such a CMS will assure the proper timing, location and design of supportive urban service systems concurrent with the impacts of new development. The following benefits may
also be realized with the adoption of the CMS: • Support consistency of the Capital Improvements Element with the Future Land Use Element; • Provide for the orderly and cost-effective
expansion of public facilities; • Supplement capital improvements expenditures and taxing structures for capital improvements; and • Reduce the possibility of damage to the environment
from the use of overburdened facilities. The Concurrency Management System, the basis of which is incorporated in the Land Use and Capital Improvement Elements, will include the guidelines
for interpreting and applying LOS standards to applications for development orders and development permits. It will establish development review procedures in the City’s Land Development
Regulations that will make development approval
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-9 contingent on the City’s ability
to provide facilities and services or require that the developer provide facilities and services in order to maintain adopted LOS standards. Petitioners will be required to supply public
facility impact information with their development applications. City staff will review and verify the project information, compare it with public facility capacity data and anticipated
committed development impacts to ensure that adopted LOS standards will be maintained if the development application is approved. If LOS will not be maintained, the petition will be
denied unless the applicant the applicant has presents revised plans demonstrating that the new development shall: • Be serviced with all requisite public facilities concurrent with
the impacts of proposed development; • Provide LOS for all requisite facilities which is compliant with the City’s adopted LOS standards; and • Shall not cause a reduction of levels
of service for existing infrastructure below minimum adopted thresholds. e. Plan Monitoring and Evaluation and Appraisal The City of Miami Gardens will formally evaluate and appraise
this Comprehensive Plan every 5-7 years, pursuant to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules. The components of this comprehensive process include the updating of socioeconomic and
development data, which is then evaluated to determine if projections were accurate and what trends have occurred. The Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the adopted Plan are then examined
for updating, compliance with current law and introduction of new initiatives for the next planning period. Monitoring measures will be compiled and analyzed. In addition, the City will
annually monitor Plan especially with the Capital Improvements Schedule implementation with respect to goals, objectives and policies as part of the budgeting process. Public participation
is built into into the entire process, which results in a final Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) that will be reviewed and adopted by the Local Planning Agency and City Council,
and transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) for review. Once the EAR is approved by all agencies, EAR-based Plan amendments will be initiated and completed
through the State-mandated process. 2. Other Public Facility Timing and Location Practices In addition to the above listed local practices for controlling the timing and location of
construction, extension or increases in capacity of each public facility, there are several others that pay a major role. The City currently utilizes: user charges and connection fees,
mandatory dedications of fees in lieu of, and moratoria. These practices are described below.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-10 a. User Charges and Connection
Fees User charges are payments for the cost of collective services and are primarily used as a financing device by local authorities. This avenue of collection may be applied to recreation
programs and other services. b. Mandatory Dedications of Fees in Lieu of The City may require that, as a condition of plat approval, subdivision developers dedicate a certain portion
of the land in the development for public purposes, such as roads, parks and schools. This contribution may be made to either the City or a private group such as a homeowners association.
In a case where the subdivision is too small or a land dedication cannot be reasonable acquired, the City may require the developer to donate a monetary amount in lieu of dedication
that is equivalent to the amount of land that would otherwise have been dedicated by the developer. The funds may be deposited into a separate account for future use toward the provision
of a public facility. c. Moratorium A moratorium is a temporary postponement of development for a specified period of time on an emergency basis authorized by City Council. This would
suspend activities such as building permits, development approvals or governmental services. Moratoria may generally be imposed for a reasonable time frame to allow for comprehensive
plan preparation, adoption and/or amendment such a Planned Town Centers. The City of Miami Gardens established a moratorium for the preparation and adoption of its future town center,
which was adopted as a master zoning plan in May 2006. 3. General Fiscal Implications of Existing Deficiencies and Future Needs Table CIE IX-10, City of Miami Gardens Five-Year Capital
Improvements Program, and Table CIE IX-11, City of Miami Gardens Additional Capital Improvements, list those capital facilities that have been identified to help address existing deficiencies
and projected needs for which the City has operation and maintenance responsibility. a. Transportation The City of Miami Gardens has developed a Transportation Master Plan to unify the
vision of the community and provide mobility options. As such, proposed improvements targeted for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities within Miami Gardens are identified to provide
a balance to the existing transportation system and subsequently incorporation into the City’s Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements when such projects involve City funding and
responsibility. The Transportation Master Plan project list/project bank described in the Transportation Element includes Capital projects that consider transit, streetscape/beautification,
traffic calming, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and intersection improvements.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-11 While the City has identified several
transportation projects being implemented by the City, there are no City projects that would be necessary for maintaining or improving the transportation level of service. Table CIE
IX-10 lists timing, cost estimates, and potential revenues sources for City projects. These projects generally reflect the City’s responsibilities in implementing the Transportation
Master Plan projects. Other agencies, especially the Florida Department of Transportation, Miami Dade Transit, and Miami Dade County, are responsible for maintaining the level of service
for transit as well as for roadways. Funding for such roadway and transit transportation projects is through a combination of local (County PTP), state and federal sources. While there
are numerous transit improvements planned by Miami Dade Transit listed in the Transportation Element, there are no significant roadway capacity improvements planned at this time. b.
Public Parks (Recreation and Open Space) There are no deficiencies in the City’s level of service for parks relative LOS for recreation and open space. As such, there are no proposed
capital improvements for parks that would be critical to maintaining level of service standards, i.e., adding lands. While that is true, the City should take appropriate opportunities
to add land to existing parks where feasible and appropriate. While level of service is not an issue per se, the City plans substantial facility improvements to better serve its citizens.
The short-range priority for the City is to renovate sixteen (16) parks and four (4) pools with amenity enhancements totaling $32 million over the next 5 years. These parks improvements
are summarized in the Recreation and Open Space Element. Table CIE IX-4 list existing parks in the city. Table CIE IX-10 illustrates timing, cost estimates and potential revenues sources
for future future park projects. Funding sources include City impact fees, developer contributions, grants, and General Fund. Together these sources provide for a financially feasible
parks and recreation renovation and improvement plan. c. Stormwater Drainage The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and Miami-Dade County currently regulate and/or operate
all stormwater management facilities and programs within the City’s boundaries; however, the City of Miami Gardens is evaluating evaluated the feasibility of taking control of this stormwater
infrastructure. Currently, the City is preparing a Stormwater Master Plan that includes an assessment of the current stormwater management system within its boundaries. In February 2007
the City completed its first Stormwater Master Plan that included an assessment of its current stormwater management system within its boundaries. The primary objective for the City’s
stormwater master plan is to inventory the existing system and develop a plan to correct existing deficiencies. Stormwater facility improvement recommendations will be developed based
upon the ability of the existing drainage facilities to maintain the adopted LOS standards within the City. These recommendations will be incorporated in the
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-12 Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements,
which will detail the financial resources necessary to plan, construct, operate and maintain the City’s stormwater management program. The master plan will identify pre-existing drainage
deficiencies in the City of Miami Gardens and will prioritize improvements, and provide for maintenance cost, schedule and responsibilities. Funding of the Stormwater Master Plan comes
primarily from the South Florida Water Management District. Capital projects proposed in the Stormwater Master Plan will be funded from the stormwater utility fees currently administered
by Miami Dade County. d. Potable Water The Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department (WASD) and the City of North Miami Beach operate and maintain the potable water system. No improvements
are planned by the City of Miami Gardens. e. Sanitary Sewer The Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department (WASD) serves as the governing authority responsible for the collection,
transmission, primary and secondary treatment, and pumping facilities in Miami Gardens. The majority of land area within the city is connected to WASD’s sanitary sewer system for wastewater
treatment. Isolated commercial and single-family residential land uses within the city utilize septic tanks for sewage treatment. There are no sanitary sewer improvements projects programmed
or planned in the City by Miami Dade WASD or North Miami Beach. f. Solid Waste Per the City’s Charter, the Miami-Dade County Department of Solid Waste Management (DSWM) is responsible
for the collection and disposal of commercial and single family residential solid waste generated within Miami Gardens. The county also provides curbside recycling service to its residential
customers. Solid waste from non-residential and multifamily residential properties is collected by private waste haulers and disposed of at one of Miami-Dade County’s sites contracted
to receive these materials. User fees pay for all service and facility improvements. No solid waste improvements are planned by the City nor are any such improvements planned within
the City by Miami Dade County. g. Other Capital Improvements As already noted, the City is in the a continuous process of applying for various grants and funding programs. As such, many
applications for such funding require that the improvements be listed in the city’s comprehensive plan. As such, the City has developed Table CIE IX-11. h. Cost Analysis of Capital Improvements
and Basis of Cost Estimates
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-13 • All costs estimates shown in
Tables CIE IX-10 and 11 are based on 2008 – 2009 2009-2010 dollars. Due to inflationary factors associated with national and state economies, these costs are likely to increase over
the extent of the planning period. The City will update projects costs on an annual basis to reflect more accurate project costs. • The method employed to reach cost estimates for each
proposed capital improvement varies according to its respective public facility. The basis for these cost estimates is summarized as follows: • Public Parks and Public Buildings: City
of Miami Gardens Parks and Recreation Department • Transportation Improvements: City of Miami Gardens Transportation Master Plan and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 5-Year
work program. • Drainage Improvements: The City of Miami Gardens Public Works Department is the department responsible for implementing drainage improvements. Cost estimates for drainage
improvements will be available upon the completion of the Stormwater Master Plan for the Miami Gardens. E. IMPACT OF PROPOSED PUBLIC SCHOOL OR MEDICAL SYSTEM FACILITIES ON PUBLIC FACILITIES
Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Interlocal agreement for Public School Facility Planning that the City entered into with Miami-Dade County on December 12, 2007, the City will coordinate
land use and public school facilities planning with all affected parties of the Agreement. As detailed in the Public School Facilities Element, the Miami-Dade County Public School Board
has proposed to completely replace two high schools within the Miami Gardens area. Any impacts that these schools will place on the City’s public facilities will be addressed on a case-by-case
basis. It is anticipated that because these are replacement schools, there will not be any significant effect on current or proposed levels of services for short and long–range planning
periods. Neither a hospital nor other major public health facility has been established within the City. Any improvements to the closest area hospitals will not have a direct significant
impact on the City of Miami Gardens. F. TIMING AND LOCATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN The City’s CDMP has incorporated management concepts that
require the efficient location and timing of supportive urban infrastructure to service existing and anticipated future development. Existing and anticipated future land use patterns
are included in the Future Land Use Element Data, Inventory and Analysis. The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) is adopted as part of the CDMP Goals, Objectives and Policies.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-14 Management techniques which have
been applied in order to control the location, timing and design of public facilities are summarized below. Application of the following techniques has been mandated through goals, objectives
and policies within the Future Land Use, Transportation, Infrastructure and Capital Improvements Elements. This section primarily emphasizes techniques applicable to the location, timing
and design of potable water and wastewater systems as well as traffic circulation improvements since these facilities most significantly impact the location and timing of future development
and redevelopment. These techniques are as follows: a. Minimum levels of service standards have been adopted for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, recreation and
open space and the transportation system. b. Principles to establish a concurrency management system (CMS) are incorporated in the Future Land Use Element, Transportation Element, and
Capital Improvements Element. The CMS shall assure the proper timing, location and design of supportive urban service systems concurrent with impacts of new development. This management
program will stipulate that no new development will be approved unless the applicant has presented plans demonstrating that the new development shall: o Be serviced with all public facilities
concurrent with the impacts of development; o Provide a level of service for all facilities in compliance with the City’s adopted LOS standards; and o Shall not cause a reduction of
level of service for existing infrastructure below minimum adopted thresholds. c. A Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements is included herein. (see Table CIE IX-10). Because the
City of Miami Gardens was an already-established community that was substantially developed at the date of incorporation, responsibilities for services and facilities had already been
established. Those already-established responsibilities are reflected in the City’s Charter. At the date of this writing, the City has responsibility for parks facilities for which there
are no foreseen deficiencies in level of service, existing or anticipated. The City completed its Stormwater Master Plan in Spring 2007 and took over the stormwater utility from Miami
Dade County, and incurred the responsibility for drainage facilities and services. At that time, the City will update the Schedule of Capital Improvements with a prioritized project
list. d. The City’s budget process provides a process for annually inventorying and evaluating needed public improvements within the context of a public and continuing process. This
provides the basis to then amend the Schedule of Capital Improvements included in the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Each year a capital improvement
budget is adopted which describes capital improvements expenditures
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-15 programmed for the current fiscal
year as well as a schedule of anticipated capital improvements that are programmed over the next five-year period. While many of these improvements are not related to facilities and
services included in the Comprehensive Development Master Plan, the ones that are related to the plan must be reviewed and evaluated to insure consistency with the Plan. Major factors
included in the Schedule of Capital Improvements include the following: o The nature of the respective projects, including location and brief project descriptions; o Estimated cost of
respective projects; o Scheduled phasing and/or timing of respective projects; and o Identification of other governmental or private entities responsible for assisting in the execution
of capital improvements. This consideration incorporates intergovernmental coordination concepts which which link local interests with those of Miami Dade County, state and regional
agencies and special purpose districts. e. The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Capital Improvements Elements include stipulations that commit the City to continued enforcement of
performance standards and level of service standards that are integrated within the City’s land development regulations. These standards address the location, timing and design of on
and off-site facilities required to ease anticipated impacts of proposed new development. f. Impact analysis, availability of water and wastewater systems, surface water management improvements
and recreation. g. The City of Miami Gardens has adopted intergovernmental coordination policies to assure continued coordination with local, state and regional agencies that are responsible
for major components of urban infrastructure. G. CONCLUSION In order to support the goals, objectives and policies of the future land use element of the CDMP, as well as to provide an
efficient approach to land development, Table CIE IX-5 shows projected expenditures versus revenues for the City. The CIP analysis considers plans of regional agencies such as MPO’s
TIP, Miami-Dade County’s Water Supply Plan and other related agencies that provide public facilities to the City. The projects listed in Table CIE IX-10 are sufficient for their timing
and to support efficient land development and to support the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element of the CDMP. Funding sources are noted with all priority projects
and additional capital improvement projects in Table CIE IX -11. Table CIE IX-12 shows a comparison between expeditures and operating revenues for the period of FY 08-09 09-10 through
FY 13-14 14-15. This is intended to demonstrate the financial feasibility of the CDMP. Tables CIE IX-5 and CIE IX-12 present a financial feasible scenario
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-16 because they demonstrate a surplus
and the City’s ability to finance capital improvements necessitated by the anticipated population and revenues. The listing of capital projects in Table CIE IX-10 is considered financially
feasible within the five-year period based on the current revenue projections and sources of funding. Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes requires sufficient revenues be available for
the first three years or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5 of a 5-year capital improvement schedule. The City has established the entire City
proper as an urban service area. While the City is committed to renovation and master planning of its existing parks, there are no required capital improvements necessary to maintain
the level of service for open space and recreation. While supporting the North Corridor Metrorail Extension and other Miami Dade Transit improvements and services, the City does not
fund or otherwise provide these facilities and services. Other than potential intersection improvements, there are no proposed road capacity improvements on roads in Miami Gardens; all
major roads are maintained by entities other than the City. Similarly, potable water and sanitary sewer services are provide by Miami Dade County, primarily through user fees. As noted
in the Future Land Use Element and Infrastructure Elements, there is very little change anticipated between the existing Miami Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan and the
City of Miami Gardens Comprehensive Development Master Plan. The difference between the two plans regarding infill development of vacant lands is insignificant. Redevelopment is encouraged
along existing and well-established major transportation corridors which are served by existing central services plus major transportation infrastructure and services. These corridors
are designated as Commerce areas. The City’s Neighborhood areas will not require major infrastructure because facilities and services are already in place.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-17 Table CIE IX -1: Miami-Dade Hospitals
Within 12 Miles of the City of Miami Gardens NAME ADDRESS BEDS MILES Aventura Hospital 20900 Biscayne Blvd, Aventura, FL 33180 407 6.9 Jackson Memorial 1611 NW 12 Avenue, Miami, FL 33136
1567 11.5 Memorial West 703 North Flamingo Road, Pembroke Pines, FL 33023 174 12 Palmetto General 2001 West 68 Street, Hialeah, FL 33016 360 8.9 Jackson North 160 NW 170 Street, North
Miami Beach, FL 33169 382 2.2 Source: Miami Dade County, City of Miami Gardens Planning and Zoning Department, July 2006 Table CIE IX -2: Health Care Facilities in Miami Gardens NAME
ADDRESS North Dade Neighborhood Center 16545-55 NW 25 Avenue, Miami Gardens, FL 33054 Department of Health 1725 NW 167 Street, Miami Gardens, FL 33056 Sources: City of Miami Gardens
Planning and Zoning Department, July 2006
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-18 Table CIE IX -3: Public Schools
Inventory SCHOOL NAME ADDRESS ACRES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Barbara Hawkins Elementary 19010 NW 37 Av.; Miami Gardens 33056 26 Brentwood Elementary 3101 NW 191 St.; Miami Gardens 33056
10.9 Bunche Park Elementary 16001 Bunche Park Dr.; Miami Gardens 7.6 Carol City Elementary 4375 NW 173 Dr.; Miami Gardens 33056 10.9 Crestview Elementary 2201 NW 187 St.; Miami Gardens
33056 6.5 Golden Glades Elementary 16520 NW 28 Av.; Miami Gardens 33054 7 Hibiscus Elementary 18701 NW 1 Av.; Miami Gardens 33169 6.3 Lake Stevens Elementary† 5101 NW 183 St.: Miami,
FL 33055 -Miami Gardens Elementary 4444 NW 195 St.; Miami Gardens 33055 13.5 Myrtle Grove Elementary 3125 NW 176 St.; Miami Gardens 33056 9.3 Norland Elementary 19340 NW 8 Court; Miami
Gardens 33169 24.1 North County Elementary 3250 NW 207 St.; Miami Gardens 33056 8.2 North Dade Center for Modern Language* 1840 NW 157 St.; Miami Gardens 33054 10.3 North Glade Elementary†
5000 NW 177 St.; Miami, FL 33055 -Norwood Elementary 19810 NW 14 Ct.; Miami Gardens 33169 10.1 Parkview Elementary 17631 NW 20 Av.; Miami Gardens 33056 8.7 Parkway Elementary 1320 NW
188 St.; Miami Gardens 33169 7.9 Rainbow Park Elementary 15355 NW 19 Av.; Miami Gardens 33054 6.4 Scott Lake Elementary 1160 NW 175 St.; Miami Gardens 33169 8.5 Skyway Elementary 4555
NW 206 Terr.; Miami Gardens 33055 7.9 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Carol City Middle 3737 NW 188 St.; Miami Gardens 33055 26 Lake Stevens Middle† 18484 NW 48 Pl.; Miami, FL 33055 -Norland Middle
1235 NW 192 Terr.; Miami Gardens 33169 13.9 North Dade Middle* 1840 NW 157 St.; Miami Gardens 33054 10.3 Parkway Middle 2349 NW 175 St.; Miami Gardens 33056 18.4 Andover Middle 1450
NE 2nd Avenue; Miami Gardens 33169 9 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Hialeah-Miami Lakes Senior High † 7977 West 12 Av.; Hialeah, FL 33014 -Miami Carol City Senior High 3422 NW 187 St.; Miami
Gardens 33056 29 Miami Norland Senior High 1050 NW 195 St.; Miami Gardens 33169 24 *Note: North Dade Middle and North Dade Center for Modern Language are located within the same facility.
† Schools located outside city boundaries, but serve a significant number of students residing in Miami Gardens. Source: Miami Dade County School Board and City of Miami Gardens Planning
and Zoning Department, October 2008.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-19 Table CIE IX -4: Public Parks Inventory
PARK NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS ACREAGE Andover Park NW 209 St. & 1 AVE. 2.87 Brentwood Park NW 195 St. & NW 32 Ave. 10.00 Brentwood Pool 18800 NW 28 Place 4.50 Buccaneer Park 3100 NW 207
St. 5.50 Bunche Park & Pool 15600 Bunche
Park Dr. West 7.11 Carol City Community Center Park NW 199 St. & 27 Ave. 24.00 Carol Park 4250 NW 178 St. 5.66 Cloverleaf Park 303 NW 191 St. 1.27 Lake Lucerne Park 20701 NW 22 Ave.
2.00 Library Walking Trail (County Park) East of North-Dade Regional Library and South of Dolphin Stadium 26.18 Miami Carol City Park 3201 NW 185 St. 16.61 Myrtle Grove Park & Pool 3030
NW 179 St. 7.69 North Dade Optimist Park 19455 NW 12 Ave. 4.13 Norwood Park & Pool 19401 NW 14 Ave 4.94 Risco Park 19000 NW 37 Ave 16.40 Rolling Oaks Park 18701 NW 17 Ave. 39.53 Scott
Park 17710 NW 15 Court 9.70 Scrub Oak Preserve (County Park) Natural Preserve Area south of Dolphin Stadium 6.28 Vista Verde Park 21001 NW 39 Ave. 4.82 Watermen Park South of Lot 21,
Block 2 of Jordan’s Landing Plat 1.00 Source: City of Miami Gardens Development Services Department, April 2005
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-20 Table CIE IX -5: City of Miami
Gardens Budget Summary, FY 08-09-10 ALL FUNDS ESTIMATED FY 08-09 (unaudited) BUDGETED FY 09-10 PERCENT CHANGE REVENUES Taxes 23,683,854 23,089,178 0.0 Franchise Fees 5,588,428 5,779,802
3.42 Intergovernmental Revenue 9,766,431 9,998,000 2.38 Utility Taxes 13,954,091 14,569,760 4.41 Fuel Taxes 2,295,000 2,335,000 -1.74 Fines and Forfeitures 361,000 377,000 4.43 Licenses&
Permits 4,258,000 4,510,000 5.92 Miscellaneous 4,088,726 8,162,417 86.94 Charges for Services 2,322,071 2,140,250 -7.83 Grants and /Loans/Bonds 17,668,752 37,606,182 112.80 Interfund
Transfers 27,100,375 20,721,455 33.88 Appropriated Fund Balance 23,733,377 20,800,094 -12.36 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 134,820,105 150,089,138 11.32 EXPENDITURES Personnel Services (1)
44,600,121 53,451,116 19.85 Operating Expenses (Including Debt Service) 42,257,762 46,559,174 10.18 Capital Outlay (2) 42,419,763 43,734,512 3.1 Administrative Charges 1,274,304 1,301,939
2.12 Contribution to CIP 12,029,717 14,418,284 16.6 Contribution to Reserve 0 0 0 Debt Services 5,542,459 6,344,306 14.47 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 148,124,126 165,809,331 11 NOTES
* FY 2008-2009 2009-2010 Estimate Source: City of Miami Gardens Annual Operating Budget FY 2008-2009 2009-2010.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page IX-21 Table CIE IX -6: Projection of
Ad Valorem Tax Revenues Year Projected Taxable Value (000) Millage Rate Projected Revenue 2009 4,695,454 5.1402 24,135,573 2010 4,503,604 5.3734 24,199,666 2011 4,548,640 5.3734 24,441,662
2012 4,730,586 5.3734 25,419,329 2013 4,967,115 5.3734 26,690,295 2014 5,265,142 5.3734 28,291,713 2015 5,581,050 5.3734 29,989,216 Methodology: 2008 and 2009 2009 and 2010 known; 2010-2014
2011-2015 projected based on 2008/2009/2010 trend. Source: City of Miami Gardens Planning and Zoning Finance Department; October, 2008 December 2009.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY & ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-22 Table CIE IX -7: Projections of
Non-Ad Valorem Tax Revenues REVENUES FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FRANCHISE FEES Electric 4,564,802 4,564,802 4,610,450 4,771,816 4,938,829 5,111,688 Gas 160,000
161,600 163,216 164,848 166,497 168,162 Solid Waste 1,050,000 1,081,500 1,119,353 1,158,530 1,199,078 1,241,046 UTILITY TAXES Electricity 5,609,562 5,609,562 5,665,658 5,863,956 6,069,194
6,281,616 Water 955,740 974,855 994,352 1,014,239 1,034,524 1,055,214 Gas 277,000 282,540 288,191 293,955 299,834 305,830 LICENSES & PERMITS Occupational Licenses 1,345,000 1,345,000
1,345,000 1,345,000 1,345,000 1,345,000 Certificates of Use 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Landlord Permits 195,000 196,950 198,920 200,909 202,918 204,947 Lien Searches
50,000 50,000 55,000 60,500 66,550 73,205 Alarm Permit Fees 35,000 36,050 37,132 38,245 39,393 40,575 Lien reduction Applications 127,759 128,000 128,000 0 0 0 Bid Spec Fees 10,000 10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Judgment & Fines 340,000 349,450 359,231 371,804 382,281 393,125 Other Licenses, Fees & Permit 35,000 35,350 35,704 36,061 36,421 36,785 Source: City of Miami
Gardens Finance Department, October 2008 December 2009. Table CIE IX -8: Projections of Operating Costs FUND FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 Transportation 4,161,018
4,285,973 4,457,957 4,637,270 4,824,241 5,019,214 Parks 9,782,800 10,052,743 10,431,583 10,825,652 11,235,599 11,662,103 Source: City of Miami Gardens Finance Department, October 2008
December 2009.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-23 Table CIE IX -9: Miami Gardens
Level of Service Standards TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE Facility Type Location Inside Miami Gardens Roadways Parallel to Exclusive Transit Facilities Inside Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas FIHS/SIS -Limited Access Highway LOS D [E] LOS E LOS D [E] FIHS/SIS -Controlled Access Highway LOS D LOS E LOS E Non -FIHS/SIS Facilities --Areawide LOS E* Notes: FIHS
= Florida Intrastate Highway System. SIS = Strategic Intermodal System LOS inside of [brackets] applies to general use lanes only when exclusive through lanes exist. * The overall average
LOS within each TCMA shall remain at E or better. FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICES STANDARDS Potable Water Miami-Dade County Service Area Level of Service Standard • Regional Treatment:
The regional treatment system shall operate with a rated capacity no less than 2 percent above the maximum daily flow for the preceding year and an average daily capacity 2 percent above
the average daily system demand for the preceding 5 years. • Water Quality: Water quality shall meet all federal, state, and county primary standards for potable water. • Countywide
Storage Capacity: County-wide storage capacity for
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-24 FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICES
STANDARDS finished water shall equal no less than 15 percent of the countywide average daily demand. • Water is delivered to users at a pressure no less than 20 pounds per square inch
(psi) and no greater than 100 psi. • Miami Gardens will adopt the County’s system-wide per capita of 155 gallons per capita per day as its LOS. • The minimum fire flows maintained by
WASD shall be based on the following land uses: Single Family Residential/Estate, Single Family, Duplex, and Residential on minimum lots of 7,500 square feet, Multifamily Residential;
Semiprofessional Offices, Hospitals; Schools, Business and Industry. City of North Miami Beach Service Area Level of Service Standard • Potable Water: the City's water system shall provide
144 gallons per person per day at a pressure of 40 pounds per square inch (psi). The City attempts to maintain a water pressure of 40 pounds per square inch (psi) although 20 psi is
the legal minimum. • Miami Gardens will adopt the LOS standards of 144 gallons per person per day consistent with North Miami Beach level of service standards. Sanitary Sewer Miami-Dade
County Service Area Level of Service Standard • Regional wastewater treatment plants shall operate with a physical capacity of no less than the annual average daily sewage flow. • Effluent
discharged from wastewater treatment plants shall meet
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-25 FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICES
STANDARDS all federal, State, and County standards. • The system shall maintain the capacity to collect and dispose of 102 percent of average daily sewage demand for the preceding 5
years. City of North Miami Beach Service Area Level of Service Standard • The sanitary sewer collection system within the City shall accommodate an average daily flow of at least 85
gallons per person per day. • The County treatment and disposal system shall operate with a design capacity of 2 percent above the daily flow of the preceding year. Otherwise, septic
tanks shall be the level of service. Stormwater Drainage Water Quality Standard. Stormwater facilities shall meet the design and performance standards established in Chapter 62-25, Florida
Administration Code (FAC), with treatment of the runoff from the first one inch of rainfall onsite to meet the water quality standards required by Chapter 62-302, Rule 862-302.500, FAC
Water Quantity Standard. Where two or more standards impact a specific development, the most restrictive standard shall apply: • Post-development runoff shall not exceed the predevelopment
runoff rate for a 25-year storm event, up to and including an event with 24-hour duration. • Treatment of the runoff from the first one inch of rainfall onsite or the first ½ inch of
runoff from impervious areas, whichever is greater. Solid Waste Maintain solid waste disposal capacity sufficient enough to accommodate waste flows to the system through long-term
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-26 FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICES
STANDARDS interlocal agreements or contracts along with anticipated noncommitted waste flows for a period of five (5) years (Same as Miami Dade County). Public Schools Pursuant to state
law and administrative rules, the City shall coordinate with the Miami-Dade School Board and adopt a School Concurrency Program with an accompanying Level of Service Standard of 100%
utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity (With relocatable classrooms) that will ensure the adequate supply of schools to serve the student population in the
City of Miami Gardens. Public Parks 1.0 acre(s) of public park facility per 1,000 residents.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-27 Table CIE IX -10: City of Miami
Gardens Schedule of Capital Improvements PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE RECREATION AND
OPEN SPACE Andover Park $204,769 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Brentwood Park $200,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees
and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Brentwood Park $20,000 $20,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Buccaneer Park Renovations & Improvements TBD
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Buccaneer Park $510,285 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants
and Bonds A.J King Park Renovations & Improvements $245,500 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-28 Cloverleaf Park Renovations
& Improvements $163,788 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14
FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Lake Lucerne Park $231,588 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Miami Carol City Park
Complex Renovations & Improvements $590,734 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Miami Carol City Park $809,010 $300,000 $300,000 $1,409,010
General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds MG Center $18,315,470 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds MG Recreation
Center $10,784,854 1,000,000 $11,784,854 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Myrtle Grove Park $195,440 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
Assessments, Grants and Bonds Norwood Park and Pool $441,664 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-29 Assessments, Grants and Bonds
Norwood Park and Pool $354,652 $354,652 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14
FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Risco Park Renovations & Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Scott Park Renovations
& Improvements TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Vista Verde Park $199,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
Assessments, Grants and Bonds Bunche Park $1,592,051 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Bunche Park $1,466,170 $1,466,170 General Revenues,
Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Rolling Oaks Park $5,849,169 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-30 Rolling Oaks Park and Trail
$4,159,933 $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $7,659,933 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Rolling Oaks Land Addition $2,700,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General
Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE
Rolling Oaks Land Addition $2,436,700 $2,436,700 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds North Dade Optimist Club Park $726,384 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues,
Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds North Dade Optimist Park $1,041,084 $1,041,084 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Miscellaneous Parks $457,962
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Miscellaneous Parks $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
Assessments, Grants and Bonds New Park $1,500,000 $1,500,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-31 and Bonds Senior Center $400,000
$400,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Spirit of Christ Land $100,000 $100,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments,
Grants and Bonds PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SUBTOTAL $21,572,403
$1,700,000 $2,900,000 $2,100,000 $2,500,000 $500,000 $31,272,403 TRANSPORATION Miami-Dade County-Metropolitan Planning Organization (TIP) 1. S.R. 860/Miami Gardens Dr. $10,186,000 $400,000
Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded Projects 2. S.R. 7/N.W. 2nd Ave. $5,209,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
(Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-32 Projects SR 7/NW 2nd Ave. 9From
NW 176 St. to 1200' S of NW 215 St. Resurfacing). $5,209,000 $5,209,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. 3. S.R. 826/Palmetto Expy.
$7,000,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded Projects PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY
12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE SR 826/Palmetto Expwy (from SR 93/I-75 to Golden Glades Interchange. PD&E/EMO Study). $7,050,000 $7,050,000 Miami-Dade
Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. 4. S.R. 826/Palmetto Expy. $5,660,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (Transportation Improvement
Program) Federally-Funded Projects
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-33 SR 826/palmetto Expwy (from
NW 67 Ave. to NW 47 Ave. Add Auxillary Lane(s).) $5,660,000 $5,660,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. 5. City Wide School Safety
Pgrm. $100,000 $900,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded FDOT District VI Projects PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE 6. S.R.826/N.W. 167th Ave. $676,000 $476,000 $18,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
(Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded Projects SR 826/NW 167 St. (From SR 817/NW 27 Ave. to NW 27 Ave. EB Offramp. Intersection -Modify). $476,000 $18,000 $494,000 Miami-Dade
Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. 7. Snake Creek $350,000 $3,350,000 Miami-Dade
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-34 Trail Metropolitan Planning
Organization (Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded Projects Snake Creek Trail (from NE Miami Gardens Drive to NW 17 Ave/Turnpike. Bike Path/Trail). $400,000 $3,829,000
$4,229,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15
TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE 8. MDTA-North Corridor $1,960,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (Transportation Improvement Program) Federally-Funded FDOT District
VI Projects MDTA North Corridor (From Martin Luther King Jr. Metrorail Station to Miami-Dade/Broward County Line. Metrorail $30,764,000 $66,899,000 $56,000,000 $56,000,000 $56,000,000
$265,663,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program
. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-35 Extension). NW 7th Ave.(From
183 St. to 199 St. Widening, Drainage, Pavement Markings). $2,122,000 $2,122,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. SR 826/7 Ave.
Ext. (from 850' SW of NW 7 Ave. to SR7/US 441/NW 2nd Ave. Resurfacing). $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. PROJECT
ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Sr 7/N 7 Ave. (from NW 159 St. to NW 177 St. Landscaping.) $4,140,000
$699,000 $165,000 $5,004,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. Miami-Dade Countywide ADV Traveler Information System. Electronic
Signs/Monitoring. $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 2010 Transportation Improvement Program.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-36 9. Resurface Miami-Dade Mainline
( From Golden Glades to Milepost 3.34) $300,000 $3,182,000 $3,482,000 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. MPO-TIP SUBTOTAL $38,222,000
$88,719,000 $60,012,000 $56,000,000 $56,000,000 $0 $298,953,000 FDOT, District VI-Five Year Work Program Non-Intrastate State Highway-SR 860, SR 7, SR 817 Landscaping Routine Maintenance
$31,357 $31,357 $31,357 $31,357 $31,357 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate State Highway-SR 860, SR 7, SR 817 Landscaping Routine Maintenance $31,357
$31,357 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING
SOURCE Intrastate Turnpike-Construct Ort Plaza at Miami Gardens (Golden Glades Toll Plaza) SIS $$22,725 SIS Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-37 Transit-MDTA – North Corridor
Metro rail Extension Along NW 27th Ave. (Fixed Guideway Improvements) $52,911,000 $60,302,000 $68,983,000 $68,983,000 $68,983,00 0 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District
VI Transit-MDTA – North Corridor Metro rail Extension Along NW 27th Ave. (Fixed Guideway Improvements) $24,750,000 $24,750,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Transit-MDTA
– North Corridor Metro rail Extension Along NW 27th Ave. (Fixed Guideway Improvements) $2,450,000 $2,450,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY
08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Transit-MDTA – North Corridor Metro rail Extension Along NW 27th Ave. (Fixed
Guideway Improvements) $2,450,000 $2,450,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District District VI
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-38 Non-System Specific-Snake Creek
Trail from NE Miami Gardens Dr. to NW 17th Ave./Turnpike Preliminary Engineering/Construction (Bike Trail) $400,000 $3,828,571 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-System
Specific Snake Creek Trail from NE Miami Gardens Drive to NW 17 Ave./Turnpike Bike Path/Trail. $645,000 $5,255,000 $5,900,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate
State Highway-SR 817/NW 27th Ave. from SR 9/NW 27th Ave. to NW 187th St. (Resurfacing) $12,728 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Non-Intrastate Off State Highway (NW 13/12th Ave. from NW 155 Drive to NW 179 St. Resurfacing)
$437,767 $437,767 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI ARRA-FTA 5307 City of Miami $1,061,808 $1,061,808 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-39 Gardens Urban Formula Funding
(Capital for Fixed Route) District VI Non-Intrastate off State Highway ( NW 12 Ave. from NW 183rd St. to NW 199 St. Resurfacing) $100,000 $100,000 Florida Department of Transportation
FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate Off State highway (NW 175 St. from NW 47 Ave. to NW 12 Ave. Resurfacing.) $291,860 $291,860 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate
off State Highway (NW 191 St. from NW 47 Ave. to NW 27 Ave. Resurfacing). $319,571 $319,571 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY
09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Non-Intrastate off State highway (NW 199 St. from NW 47 Ave. to SR 817/NW 27 Ave. Resurfacing).
$362,482 $362,482 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-40 Non-Intrastate Off State highway
(NW 22 Ave. from NW 79 St. to SR 826/Palmetto Expy. Lighting) Project partially in Miami Gardens. $2,360,000 $2,360,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate
Off State Highway (NW 32 Ave. from NW 199 St. to NW 183 St. Resurfacing). $210,000 $210,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate Off State highway (NW
42 Ave. from NW 156 St. to NW 1919 St. Resurfacing). $413,640 $413,640 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate State Highway (SR 817/NW 27 Ave. at NW 207
St. Intersection -Modify). $18,144 $199,636 $217,780 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14
FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Intrastate State Highway (SR 826/Palmetto Expy Expy from NW 22 Ave. to NW 8 Ave. Landscaping). $139,000 $1,214,808 $166,452 $1,520,260
Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-41 Intrastate State Highway (SR
826/Palmetto Expy from NW 42 Ave. t NW 22 Ave. Landscaping). $104,000 $1,148,613 $1,252,613 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate Off State Highway City
of Miami Gardens Schools Safety Enhancement Program $100,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate State Highway (SR 7/NW 7 Ave. from
NW 159 St. to NW 177 St. Landscaping). $145,000 $632,859 $777,859 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Intrastate State Highway (SR 826/NW 7 Ave. Ext. from 850' SW of
NW 7 Ave. to SR/US 441/NW 2nd Ave. Resurfacing). $51 $51 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY
13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Non-Intrstate State highway (SR 826/NW 167 St. at SR 817/NW 27 Ave. NW 27 Ave. $585,000 $585,000 Florida Department of Transportation
FDOT District VI
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-42 EB Offramp Intersection-Modify).
Intrastate State highway (SR 826/Palmetto Expy from NW 67 Ave. to NW 47 Ave. Add auxillary Lanes). $3,746,800 $3,746,800 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI Non-Intrastate
State highway (SR7/NW 2nd Ave. from NW 176 St. to 1200' S of NW 215 St. Resurfacing). $60,442 $5,366,334 $5,426,776 Florida Department of Transportation FDOT District VI FDOT VI SUBTOTAL
$34,381,122 $7,418,001 $7,669,701 $3,746,800 $53,215,624 STORMWATER DRAINAGE Stormwater Drainage Project-Industrial Area $600,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant (EPA) Industrial
Area Drainage Project –Out on Design PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE Stormwater Drainage
Project-NW 45th Court $100,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant (EPA) NW 45 Court Drainage Project –Out on Design
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-43 Stormwater Drainage Projects-$745,000
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant (EPA) – Awaiting Approvals 1. N.W. 208/209 ST & N.W. 38 Place 2. NW 210 St/210 Ter &NW 38 Court 3. NW 159 Street/NW 159 Street Road 4. NW 162
St /NW 20 Avenue 1. N.W. 208/209 ST & N.W. 38 Place $150,000 $150,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant -Awaiting Approvals 2. NW 210 St/210 Ter &NW 38 Court $150,000 $150,000
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant -Awaiting Approvals 3. NW 159 Street BETWEEN nw 26 Ave. to /NW 159 Street Road $150,000 $150,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant
-Awaiting Approvals
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-44 PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST (FY 09-TO 15) FUNDING SOURCE 4. NW 162 St /NW 20 Avenue $325,000 $325,000 Stormwater Utility Fee and South Florida Water
Management District. Stormwater Improvements per Stormwater Master Plan Prioritized Project List $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $600,000 Stormwater Utility Fee,
Grants and Other Funding Sources for Matching NW 21 Ave. from NW 194
Ter. To NW 196 St. $350,000 $350,000 Stormwater Utility Fee and South Florida Water Management District. STORMWATER SUB-TOTAL $800,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,650,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $93,422,614 $71,845,357 $87,083,357 $77,210,928 $69,114,357 $122,725 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $94,975,525 $97,937,001 $70,681,701 $61,946,800 $58,600,000 $384,141,027 TBD
= To be Determined Source: City of Miami Gardens, October 2008 December 2009. FY 10-11*: Miami Gardens Short-Range Planning Timeframe.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-45 Table CIE IX -11: City of Miami
Gardens Schedule of Additional Capital Improvements PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST FY 10-15 FUNDING SOURCE Police Building
$446,827 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Police Building $446,827 $46,000 $46,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds City
Hall $2,250,000 $12,000,000 Bond Issue City Hall $42,300,000 $42,300,000 Bond Issue Administrative Facility – Building Design & Construction $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Bond Issue
Fueling Station $2,300,000 Bond Issue Fueling Station $2,605,289 $2,605,289 Bond Issue Palmetto Beautification $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 TBD Private and City Funds Palmetto
Beautification $120,000 $120,000 $250,000 $350,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,840,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund, Developer Contributions Public Works Complex $500,000 Bond Issue Sidewalk Renovation
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-46 Sidewalks -New and Renovation
$100,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $850,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15
TOTAL COST FY 10-15 FUNDING SOURCE Paving Program $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds Paving Program
$50,000 $400,000 $500,000 $350,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,300,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund Tree Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 TBD General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
Assessments, Grants and Bonds; State of Florida Tree Program $50,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $800,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund Dangerous Tree Mitigation $60,000 TBD
TBD Grant, General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds NW 7th Ave. Reconstruction $600,000 $4,573,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds;
State of Florida NW 7th Ave. Reconstruction $2,173,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,173,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund, Grant
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-47 PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST FY 10-15 FUNDING SOURCE City Garage Facility-Land/Building Acquisition & Construction/Renovation $2,000,000 TBD Bond
Issue Miami Gardens Dr. Landscaping Project $1,500,000 $800,000 Funding: Public works Budget and Florida Department of Transportation District VI Miami Gardens Dr./NW 183 ST Landscaping
Project $1,500,000 $700,000 $200,000 $900,000 Funding: Public works Budget and Florida Department of Transportation District VI Housing Projects $70,966 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes,
Assessments, Grants and Bonds Police Crime Lab $150,000 $150,000 General Revenues, Fees and Taxes, Assessments, Grants and Bonds UASI – Urban Area Security Inititave $500,000 $500,000
Homeland Security U.S. 441 FDOT Project $672,732 $672,732 Gas Taxes, General Fund
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-48 U.S. 441 Beautification $75,000
$75,000 75,000 $275,000 $275,000 $775,000 Gas Taxes, General Fund PROJECT ADOPTED FY 08-09 ADOPTED FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 TOTAL COST FY 10-15 FUNDING SOURCE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS Miami Dade County Public Schools Five (5) year District Work Program September 2009 (Adopted by reference) Miami-Dade County School Board WATER SUPPLY Ten (10) year Water
Supply Facility Work Plan (Adopted by reference) City of North Miami Beach Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department-Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Adopted by reference) Miami-Dade
County Water and Sewer Department TOTAL EXPENDITURES $11,577,793 $9,073,000 $1,050,000 $23,300,000 $1,300,000 $650,000 TOTAL EXPEDITURES $7,242,021 $3,095,000 $44,425,000 $1,275,000
$1,575,000 $1,300,000 $58,912,021 Source: City of Miami Gardens, October 2008 December 2009. 2009. FY 10-11*: Miami Gardens Short-Range Planning Timeframe.
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-49 Table CIE IX -12: City of Miami
Gardens 5-Year Revenue and Expenditure Summary PROJECT FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 Total Cost (FY 010-T0 FY 15) Fund Balance Forward $7,223,844 $26,840,514
$27,545,514 $29,570,514 $32,495,514 $36,770,514 $160,446,414 General Fund $2,450,000 $2,000,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $7,650,000 Transportation Fund $1,061,000 $200,000
$400,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3,161,000 Interest $125,000 $150,000 $50,000 $250,000 $250,000 $50,000 $875,000 Impact Fees $500,000 $300,000 $100,000 $150,000 $300,000 $150,000
$1,500,000 Bonds/Loans $0 $0 $42,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $42,300,000 Sale of Assets $1,000,000 $0 $500,000 $2,500,000 $4,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 Grants $21,722,691 $1,050,000 $500,000 $300,000
$300,000 $300,000 $24,172,691 Parks and Recreation $21,572,403 $1,700,000 $2,900,000 $2,100,000 $2,500,000 $500,000 $31,272,403 Storm Water Drainage $800,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
$100,000 $1,650,000 $2,850,000 Safety Improv. /ADA Compliance $0 $100,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 MDC-MPO Trans. Improv. Prog. $38,222,000 $88,719,000 $60,012,000 $56,000,000 $56,000,000
$0 $298,953,000 FDOT, District VI-Five Year Work Program $34,381,122 $7,418,001 $7,669,701 $3,746,800 $0 $0 $53,215,624 Miami Dade County Public Schools Five (5) year District Work Program
(adopted by reference) Ten (10) year Water Supply Facility Work Plan (adopted by reference) Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department-Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (adopted by
reference) TOTAL REVENUES $129,058,060 $128,577,515 $144,677,215 $95,717,314 $96,945,514 $40,420,514 $635,396,132
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AMENDMENT FEBRUARY 2010 Page XII-50 Total Expenditures-Table 10
$94,975,525 $97,937,001 $70,681,701 $61,946,800 $58,600,000 $0 $384,141,027 Total Expenditures-Table 11 $7,242,021 $3,095,000 $44,425,000 $1,275,000 $1,575,000 $1,300,000 $58,912,021
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $102,217,546 $101,032,001 $115,106,701 $63,221,800 $60,175,000 $1,300,000 $443,053,048 BALANCE $26,840,514 $27,545,514 $29,570,514 $32,495,514 $36,770,514 $39,120,514
$192,343,084 Source: City of Miami Gardens, October 2008 December 2009. FY 10-11*: Miami Gardens Short-Range Planning Timeframe.
Washuta Site Exhibit – Rolling Oaks Park Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Rolling Oaks Park North Miami Beach WellField
Exhibit – Rolling Oaks Park Washuta Site