HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.07.2010 Zoning Meeting REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 72010
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS
ZONING MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS:
The City Council sitting as the Zoning Board for the City of Miami Gardens,Florida,met in
regular session on Wednesday,July 7,2010,beginning at 705 p.m.,in the City Council Chambers,
1515 NW 167th Street, Building 5, Suite 200,Miami Gardens,Florida.
The following members of the City Council were present: Mayor Shirley Gibson, Vice
Mayor Aaron Campbell Jr.,and Council members Barbara Watson,Sharon Pritchett and Oliver G.
Gilbert. Councilmen Melvin L. Bratton and Andre Williams were not present. Motion offered by
Councilman Gilbert,seconded by Council to excuse Councilmen Bratton and Williams. This motion
passed and carried by a 5-0 voice vote.
Also in attendance were: City Manager Dr.Danny O.Crew,City Attorney Sonja K.Dickens,
and Deputy City Clerk Mario Bataille, sitting in for City Clerk Ronetta Taylor, Assistant City
Manager Daniel Rosemond,Development Services Director Jay Marder and Zoning Administrator
Cyril Saiphoo.
2. INVOCATION:
Invocation delivered by Councilman Gilbert
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Pledge of Allegiance recited in unison.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
4-A) June 2,2010—Regular Zoning Minutes
Motion offered by Councilwoman Watson,seconded by Vice Mayor Campbell to approve the
minutes, with necessary corrections, if any. This motion passed and carried by a 5-2 voice vote.
5. AGENDA ORDER OF BUSINESS
(ADDITIONS/DELETIONS/AMENDMENTS)BUSINESS(items shall be pulled
from the Consent Agenda at this time):
Motion offered by Councilman Gilbert, seconded by Councilwoman Watson to adopt the
official agenda as presented. This motion passed and carried by a 5-0 voice vote.
The Deputy City Clerk swore in all parties participating in the Quasi-Judicial Proceedings.
Councilman Gilbert announced that he has a voting conflict with Item 8B therefore he would
be recusing himself from the proceedings.
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 1 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
Cyril Saiphoo read into the record the procedure used for this Quasi-Judicial Proceeding.
6. PRESENTATIONS)
None.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
None
8. FIRST READING (ORDINANCE)/PUBLIC HEARING(S)
8-A) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CITY'S LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) AS ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-10-218; AMENDING SECTION 2-60,
"DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE';AMENDING SECTION
2-80,"GRANTING OF VARIANCES AND WAIVERS";AMENDING
SECTION 2-230,"VESTED RIGHTS";AMENDING SECTION 7-110
"DESIGN STANDARDS"; AMENDING SECTION 9-20 "USES
PERMITTED WITH EXTRA REQUIREMENTS"; AMENDING
SECTION 10-10 "ACCESSORY STRUCTURES"; AMENDING
SECTION 10-20, "ACCESSORY USE TABLE"; AMENDING
SECTION 10-30, "ADDITIONAL STANDARDS; AMENDING
ARTICLE XI, "TABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS";
AMENDING SECTION 12-160"COMMERCIAL,RECREATIONAL,
BOAT AND VESSEL VEHICLE PARKING IN RESIDENTIALLY
ZONED PROPERTY; AMENDING SECTION 12-170,
"COMMERCIAL, RECREATIONAL, BOAT AND VESSEL
PARKING IN INDUSTRIAL ZONE PROPERTY RESTRICTIONS;
AMENDING SECTION 14-10 "IN GENERAL"; AMENDING 14-20,
"LANDSCAPE PERMIT REQUIRED";AMENDING SECTION 14-60,
"LANDSCAPE,BUFFERING MINIMUM STANDARDS;AMENDING
SECTION 14-70, "EXTRA STANDARDS, EXCEPTIONS;
AMENDING SECTION 17-60, "SIGNS PERMITTED WITHOUT
SIGN PERMIT"; AMENDING APPENDIX A, "MASTER USE LIST
DEFINITIONS"; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HERETO
AS EXHIBIT "A;" PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF
REPRESENTATIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.(SPONSORED
BY THE CITY MANAGER)
Daniel Rosemond,Assistant City Manager appeared before the City Council to recount the
events relevant to this ordinance. He said at the time this ordinance was initially presented by the
Consultant it was understood that this would be a working document and from time to time
amendments would be made. When this item was presented for adoption there were some concerns
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 2 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
raised by concerned business owners. There were recommendations made at the April 7t'Zoning
meeting. Those recommendations have been incorporated in this ordinance.
Cyril Saiphoo, Zoning Administrator appeared before the City Council to go over the
recommendations included in this ordinance. He recounted on April 7, 2010, the City Council
adopted the Land Development Regulations (LDR's) with the understanding that additional
recommendations made to Council by businesses and their representatives would be reviewed by
staff and brought back for action in ninety(90)days. On May 7,2010, staff provided a summary of
the concerns and issues previously raised and solicited interested parties to submit additional
concerns or issues not previously raised. No new concerns or issues were submitted to staff. A
summary of issues and staff's proposed actions on the amendments was provided to interested parties
on June 7, 2010. The major concern raised by property owners was compliance with the new
Landscape requirement within five years. This was especially a concern with the industrial property
owners. Staff reviewed this requirement and is making a recommendation to reduce the required
number of shade trees in the light industrial and heavy industrial districts from twenty(28)per net
acre to twenty-two(22)per net acre for existing industrial developments to be in compliance in five
(5)years. The twenty-eight(28)shade trees per net acre is consistent with the requirements adopted
for the City's commercial and multi-family zoning districts and consistent with Miami-Dade
County's requirement for multi-family and planned developments; twenty-eight (28) trees
represented an increase of six(6)per acre from the Miami-Dade County's requirement of twenty-two
(22) shade trees per net acre,which is commercial and one of the industrial zoning districts.
Mr. Saiphoo stated is recommending reducing the number of required shade trees from
twenty-eight(28)to twenty-two(22). To justify this recommendation a comparison of the estimated
total tree requirements per net acre for industrial zoning districts(including shade trees,street trees
and other trees) of other municipal regulations were: Miramar with a requirement of 32 trees (58
trees with required access ways and pedestrian strips); Coral Springs with a requirement of 31;
Pembroke Pines with a requirement of 21 trees;and Miami-Dade County with a requirement of 20-
27 trees depending on industrial zoning classification.
Mr. Saiphoo said the other concern raised was that the new landscape code required
landscaping to be provided in the parking lots. Staff is recommending eliminating the landscape
island requirement in the industrial areas. The justification for making this recommendation is
because consideration was given to the daily operation of industrial properties,which include large
tractor trailer traffic maneuvering on and about the properties. The adopted requirement to provide
landscaped islands and shade trees may create some physical hardships for maintaining turning
radius for trucks considering that the requirement would require a retrofit of existing parking areas
with islands, curbing, and shade trees. Furthermore, considering that the industrial properties are
predominantly built out with existing buildings and parking improvements and considering much of
the industrial properties are not on major corridors of the City,the omittance of the landscape island
will not have a detrimental impact on the City's intent and purpose of its landscape requirements.
This recommendation is only for the existing industrial properties.
Mr. Saiphoo said staff has been using the adopted Land Development Regulations for
approximately three months had have discovered areas that needed clarification on some of the
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 3 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
provisions. Staff found that despite adopting the new Land Development Regulations the City has
inherited a lot of Miami-Dade County situations, which requires specific codes to deal with them.
Mayor Gibson opened the floor for this public hearing.
Brian Adler,200 South Biscayne Boulevard,Suite 2500,Miami,Florida,appeared before the
City Council to address that section of the Land Development Regulation relating to the granting of
variances. He opined the recommendation being made by staff will take the flexibility of the
Council to grant variances. He suggested that the Council not approve staff's new recommendation.
Graham Penn, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, appeared before the City
Council. He expressed concern about the impact of the new regulations on existing properties within
the City. Primary concern is the new landscaping regulations,with compliance within five years. He
said back in April he had suggested that his clients be exempt from complying within that five year
period. He suggested that the Council make a small change to the landscaping regulations (knee
walls). He said this particular requirement would be the most expensive for property owners in the
industrial area. He asked that those properties that will uniquely impacted by the requirement of the
knee wall,be exempted.
Steven Renick, a representative of Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price and Axelrod,LLP appeared
before the City Council to present a letter into the record written by Attorney Stanley Price. This
letter is attached hereto as exhibit"A".
There being no other interested parties to speak on this item,the public hearing was closed.
Motion offered by Councilman Gilbert, seconded by Councilwoman Watson to adopt this
item on first reading.
Councilman Gilbert asked if the knee wall is not going to be visible why is the City making
that a requirement.
Jay Marder, Development Services Director in response to Councilman Gilbert's question
said the knee wall is visible. It is also not a continuing requirement. He further stated there is also
flexibility with this requirement.
Councilwoman Watson asked about the eighteen(18)administrative variances that could be
granted administratively.
Attorney Dickens in response to Councilwoman Watson's inquiry explained most cities have
standards for variances. The reason for standards is when something is presented to the Council;
there will be a basis for approving the variance (hardship).
Brian Adler reappeared before the Council to expound on his earlier statement. He said the
first criteria for granting a variance is based on the physical description of the property.
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 4 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
Vice Mayor Campbell expressed concern with staff's recommendation as it relates to
granting variances. He further expressed concern with the requirement of knee wall, and cited
security issues. He stated that he was opposed this ordinance the way that it is currently written.
Attorney Dickens suggested having some standards because she was uncomfortable with not
having any standards. She suggested eliminating standards 1-3. She further stated that standards 4-
9 were not necessarily considered hardship criteria. She stated that she was most concerned about
the non-use variance.
Mayor Gibson referenced the properties along NW 13th Avenue in the Sunshine Industrial
Park and stated most of those properties did not have parking, which would require a knee wall.
Jay Marder,Development Services Director in response to Mayor Gibson's comment shared
most of the buildings in that area does not have parking lots.
Mayor Gibson shared previously when this area was controlled by Miami-Dade Council there
were no landscaping requirements. Therefore, no landscaping was provided even though it was a
requirement of the Miami-Dade County's Code. Once Miami Gardens incorporated, it started
enforcing many of the existing requirements in Miami-Dade County's Code.
Mr.Marder said staff recognizes that in many instances the landscaping requirements cannot
be met therefore,the Land Development Regulations has flexibilities in those instances. The main
focus is to provide landscaping on the major streets.
Mayor Gibson asked how will staff monitor those properties to ensure that properties have
come into compliance within the five(5)year period.
Mr. Marder in response to Mayor Gibson's inquiry shared that staff is working on some
SOP's to address the different circumstances. An education campaign will also be implemented.
Councilwoman Pritchett asked for clarification as to whether correspondence was sent out the
property and business owners about the proposed amendments.
Mr. Saiphoo said the summary was sent to the business and property owners. Staff received
some response however they were the same comments that were made at the April 7th Zoning
meeting.
Councilwoman Pritchett asked if those comments were indicative of the comments raised
tonight.
Mr. Saiphoo said the comments received tonight were new. Furthermore, staff did not
receive the letter from Attorney Stanley Price.
Councilwoman Pritchett opined it is very important to meet some kind on consensus with
property and business owners. Many of the businesses within the City hire residents. She asked if a
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 5of10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 71 2010
clear cut definitive plan of action to have the business owners come to the table to discuss this so that
some of the issues can be ironed out.
Mr. Saiphoo said the business and property owners had ninety days(90)days to submit any
other concerns they might have had. No new concerns were every submitted until a day prior to this
hearing.
Attorney Adler appeared before the Council and opined that a workshop would be helpful.
He said there may have been a misunderstanding. He thought that a workshop would be scheduled
prior to this item coming before the Council.
Attorney Penn shared after the discussions staff concluded that it would not be necessary to
have a sit down to talk about the issues. Staff deemed it would be appropriate to do it in writing.
Councilman Gilbert asked whether the City's LDR provides large scale plans and for Council
determining if it is consistent with the City's Landscape Plan and approve it.
Mr. Saiphoo in response to Councilman Gilbert's inquiry said typically large plan are when
you have specific zoning purpose or planned development. A Planned Development Zoning District
allows you to establish your own criteria for landscaping requirements. However,in general if you
are a typical thirty(30)acre commercial property you are at the same standards.
Councilman Gilbert said he did not know if we should be treating thirty(30)acre property the
same as a forty (40) acre property. He said he was not sure how the other Council members felt
however he would like to see something done with the new law. However, the City Attorney's
recommendation with standards 1-3 was a good thought. On the other hand he did not want to place
strict limitations on granting variances.
Councilwoman Pritchett asked Attorney Dickens to provide clarity.
Attorney Dickens shared before the LDR was brought before the Council initially,for first
reading;there were several meetings and negotiations. There was give and take on both sides. At
some point you cannot make everybody happen and at some point the policy makers have to make a
decision. To get this discussion down to two issues is outstanding. She stated that she wants the
record to reflect that staff worked hard on the LDR. It was give and take all along. She shared that
she had made a statement at the April 7t' meeting that individuals would not be happen with
everything that staff recommended.
Councilwoman Pritchett thanked Attorney Dickens for her comments. She said she also
heard some un-readiness from members of the dais,which she agrees with as it relates the knee wall;
as it relates to the landscaping.
Attorney Dickens suggested that Council adopt this item on first reading and allow staff to
come back with recommendations for the concerns raised tonight.
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 6 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
Councilman Gilbert asked staff to look at the forty (40) acre provision and the possible
impact.
Manager Crew said the forty(40)acre provision is dealing with existing sites.
Marc Napolitano, 1521 NW 165th Street,Miami Gardens,Florida,Sunshine Industrial Park
appeared before the City Council and shared the parks are individual lands. Unless the Council
specifically set aside some special districts for industrial,the applications would not work. This is
something the property owners are not opposed to beautifying the city.
Councilman Gilbert asked whether the Council wanted the industrial park to be consistent;if
so,he did not know why the industrial park would not be treated as one.
Manager Crew said there are hundreds of individual property owners in this particular park.
There are industrial properties around the City that are not in a park.
Mr. Napolitano said they were not looking for total exemption. There are inconsistencies
throughout the park. For example NW 13th Avenue does not have a swale area. Another example is
that some of the properties do not have any parking area. He expressed a desire to work with staff to
come to an amicable solution to the problems.
Mayor Gibson through her involvement with the Miami-Dade Community Council
recounted her relationship with many of the property owners in this industrial park. She said many
of the issues existing at that time were never resolved. She asked why can there not be a property
owner's association comprised of the business and property owners in this industrial park. This
would provide the City with more of a consensus of what is occurring in the park. This would also
open up a dialog,and working relationship with those individuals to really get this park to where the
property and business owners want it to be. She opined that giving a five year window to
accomplish something is not a short window. She encouraged the representatives present to put
their thoughts and concerns in writing and share that information with staff so that a resolution can
be reached.
Councilwoman Watson stated that apparently the written communication between staff and
the property and business owners is not sufficient. She asked staff to hold a workshop with the
affected property and business owners in the Sunshine Industrial Park. She asked that the property
and business owners be forthcoming at that workshop,with their concerns.
Councilman Gilbert encouraged everyone to be diligent in their efforts to work out all
concerns during the scheduled workshop. He opined this should be the last time a workshop is
needed. He further shared that the Council is not expecting staff to give the property owners
everything they want,but to some to a consensus.
Councilwoman Pritchett asked whether the workshop would be properly noticed.
Manager Crew replied that the workshop would be properly noticed.
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 7 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
Mayor Gibson shared the Council will be on recess for the month of August therefore this
item would not come back before September.
Motion offered by Councilwoman Pritchett, seconded by Councilman Gilbert to defer this
item until September or after such time that a workshop has been held.
Mayor Gibson for clarification purposes indicated that the next reading would be based on
the fact that a workshop has been held. Once the workshop has been held the item would then be
scheduled to be considered by the Council.
Attorney Dickens in response to Mayor Gibson's comments replied, "Yes."
There being no further discussion on this item,the motion to defer passed and carried by a 5-
0 voice vote.
Please note, Councilman Gilbert left the dais, and the chambers before this item was
introduced.
8-B) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS,
FLORIDA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY FLORIDA
MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY, INC., FOR THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 42ND AVENUE AND N.W. 156'x' STREET, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT"A",ATTACHED HERETO,FROM
R-2,DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL AND R-15,MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO
PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR A DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF
REPRESENTATIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.(SPONSORED BY THE CITY MANAGER)
VP of Administration of Florida Memorial University, 15800 NW 42nd Avenue, Miami
Gardens, Florida, appeared before the City Council to solicit support of this ordinance on first
reading.
Mr. Nayarko of Architectural Group, 5931 NW 173rd Drive, Suite 2, Miami, Florida
appeared before the City Council to highlight aspects of the University's Master Plan and its
relationship to the neighboring community. Everything associated with the new development is in
accordance with the zoning specifications. The parking is more than adequate to accommodate the
use of the campus. There is also a projection by Miami-Dade County to construct a parking garage,
if the need is required.
Rick Stephenson, President of H Architect, Coral Gables, Florida (check paperwork)
appeared before the City Council to highlight the parking and residential living space associated with
this new development.
VP stated that Florida Memorial University has agreed to abide by the stipulations that staff
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 8 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
has outlined and is prepared to sign the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant.
Motion offered by Councilwoman Pritchett,seconded by Vice Mayor Campbell to adopt this
item on first reading.
Councilwoman Pritchett shared one of the concerns she hears all the time is related to
flooding,and asked what is being put in place to address this issue.
Mr. Stephenson appeared before the City Council in response to Councilwoman Pritchett's
question. He said all of the rainwater will be resolved and drained property within that site area.
There being no further discussion,the motion to adopt on first reading passed and carried by
a 4-0 vote.
Councilman Bratton: Not present
Vice Mayor Campbell: Yes
Councilman Gilbert: Recused
Councilwoman Pritchett: Yes
Councilwoman Watson: Yes
Councilman Williams: Not present
Mayor Gibson: Yes
A discussion was held to hold the budget workshop for Monday,July 26,2010,beginning at
10:00 a.m.
Councilwoman Pritchett indicated that she will not be able to attend this budget workshop,
but asked that the information be provided so that she can review it.
9. ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING(S)
None
10. RESOLUTION(S)/PUBLIC HEARING(S):
None.
11. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
11-A) Status Report regarding proposed amendment to Interlocal Agreement
for Public School Facility Planning.
Bharvari Pandya, Senior Planner with the City of Miami Gardens' Development Services
Department appeared before the City Council and informed them that a proposed amendment to the
Interlocal Agreement is being considered. The City Council has until September 24,2010 to respond
to this amendment.
Councilwoman Watson expressed concern as to how these amendments related to the City of
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 9 of 10
REGULAR ZONING MINUTES - JULY 7, 2010
Miami Gardens.
Ms.Pandya indicated that a representative from Miami-Dade Public Schools will be invited
to attend a meeting to discuss the proposed amendments with the City Council.
Mayor Gibson said it is important to invite the School Board Representative to come to
explain this matter. She suggested that the Council as a Body send a letter to the School Board
Representative for this district. All City Council members will sign this invitation letter inviting
Wilbur T.Holloway,School Board member for District 1 to attend the next Zoning Board meeting,
September 1,2010.
Councilwoman Watson asked that staff provided additional information, including the
minutes from the January 2010 meeting.
Ms. Pandya said this information will be provided.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before this Body, and upon a motion being duly
made by Councilman Bratton, the meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Attest: it Gi son, Mayor
(�j4de L-,I
Ronetta Taylor, NWC, City Clerk
Zoning Agenda
July 7, 2010
Page 10 of 10